واکاوی پدیدۀ بدبینی سازمانی معلمان در مدارس: پژوهشی کیفی

نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی (کیفی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
بدبینی نوعی نگرش منفی نسبت به اطرافیان، وقایع، امور و فعالیت های پیرامون است که ناشی از عدم اعتماد و باور به راستی و درستی آن ها می شود. انسان ها همواره به تفسیر محیط اطراف خود می پردازند پس هر جا که انسان فعالیت داشته باشد احتمال وقوع پدیده بدبینی وجود دارد. معلمان نیز به عنوان یکی از عناصر اصلی فرایند یاددهی یادگیری که در نهاد تأثیر گذار آموزش و پرورش به ایفای نقش می پردازند از این قاعده مستثنی نمی باشند از این رو هدف اصلی این پژوهش شناسایی مؤلفه های بدبینی سازمانی معلمان ابتدایی شهر تهران است. این پژوهش در چارچوب رویکرد کیفی و با استفاده از روش پدیدارنگاری صورت گرفته است. داده های پژوهش از طریق مصاحبه عمیق و نیمه ساختاریافته از اطلاع رسان ها جمع آوری گردیدند. انتخاب اطلاع رسان های پژوهش به صورت هدفمند و با استفاده از راهبردهای نمونه گیری با حداکثر تنوع صورت پذیرفت. اطلاع رسان ها 14 نفر بودند که همگی آن ها حداقل از 5 سال سابقه تدریس در مقطع ابتدایی برخوردار بودند. تحلیل داده ها ی حاصل در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و گزینشی صورت پذیرفت. بر اساس یافته ها، مقوله های اساسی بدبینی سازمانی معلمان شامل 1) بدبینی نسبت همکاران 2) بدبینی نسبت به اولیا 3) بدبینی نسبت به دانش آموزان 4) بدبینی نسبت به مسائل آموزشی 5) بدبینی نسبت به طرح ها و برنامه ها و 6) بدبینی نسبت به رشد حرفه ای می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Uncovering teachers’ organizational cynicism: a study with qualitative method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Nejati Hatamian 1
  • Hossein Abbasian 2
  • Hasan Reza Zaynabadi 3
  • HAMID REZA ARASTEH 4
1 PhD student in educational administration, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor Educational administration, Faculty of management, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate professor Educational administration, Faculty of management, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor Educational administration, Faculty of management, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The ministry of education is one of the biggest, most important and complicated social entities and the quality of the performance of other entities largely depend on its performance. There is no doubt that the ministry of education helps to improve and enrich the cultural, social and economic development in all societies (Hua and Herstein,2003). However, perfection of humans lies in their proper training and the ministry of education is the means to reach the ultimate human dignity. Hence, education and training have always been the greatest and the most difficult problem humans face with. Each organization has e technical core that is linked to the main mission of the organization. In the ministry of education, teaching-learning is considered the technical core and other activities are considered peripheral with regard to it (Hoy and Myskl,1395).Therefore, all the countries annually dedicate great human and financial resources to achieve this important issue. However, it can be certainly claimed that from among all the resources, the role of teachers is of huge significance because their performance in teaching-learning process has positive direct effects on the quality of the teaching and students’ academic achievement (Lockheed and Respoor,1371). Regardless of his/her role in this process, each teacher acts upon a set of values and beliefs. The beliefs might be clear and directly affect the teacher’s behavior or they might not be clear and affect the teacher’s behavior unknowingly (Nolan and Hoover,1388). Either way, teachers as the people who shoulder the important responsibility of teaching are influenced by various factors and their viewpoints and philosephy immensely influence their performance.( Vakilian,1387) Teachers’ cynicism is not an exception and can have abundant effects on their performance. Cynicism is the attitude formed of hopelessness, frustration and failure and is related to humiliation, hatred and distrust. This negative attitude has penetrated in many organizations, and it is the cause of many undesirable and negative organizational consequences and one of the problematic issues at workplace (James,2005) Coal et al. (2006) defined organizational cynicism as a value judgment derived from the job experiences of the individuals (Brown and Cregan,2008).Anderson defines organizational cynicism as a general and specific attitude that is formed by despair and hopelessness, alienation, negative feeling and distrust to the organization (Andersson,1996).Organizational cynicism is defined as the negative attitude towards the organization and consists of three dimensions:

The belief that the organization is not truthful,
Negative feeling to the organization, and
The tendency to show humiliating and malicious behaviors to the organization, which are negative according to these beliefs and feelings (Dean et al.1998) .

Therefore, organizational cynicism is a multi-dimensional concept the strength and severity of cynical attitude is a function of the strength and severity of each of the dimensions. Furthermore, studies have shown that the three dimensions are mutually connected to the cynical attitude (Levent and Keser, 2016).
Organizational cynicism leads to undesirable consequences. In a study on organizational cynicism, Chaburu et al. (2013) showed that cynicism has important and long-term negative effects on the capabilities of individuals and the organization such as lack of commitment and not performing duties (Bellini et al., 2015).
In addition, Abraham (2000) found in his study that organizational cynicism has negative effects on job satisfaction and organizational commitment and leads to alienation (with the organization) (Davis,2002).
In total, the series of studies on cynicism consequences in organizations have shown that there is a negative relationship between organizational cynicism and organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction and job performance (Brown and Cregan,2008). Hence, cynicism is the issue that should be investigated seriously.Numerous studies have been conducted so far throughout the world on cynicism in different organizations. Unfortunately, organizational cynicism among teachers has been neglected and no comprehensive studies have been carried out to identify its components. However, it should be noted that despite the similarity between organizations, academic institutions have unique features that distinguishes them from other organizations and this calls for the necessity of identifying cynicism, in particular. Accordingly, the main purpose of the present study is to identify the components of organizational cynicism among the elementary school teachers in Tehran. It was a qualitative study conducted using phenomenography method. Research data was collected through in-depth ad semi-structured interviews with the interviewees. Research samples were selected purposefully.
Considering the research subject, the most important criterion for selecting participants in the first place was having 5 years of teaching experience in elementary schools in Tehran. However, for the enrichment of the data, it was decided to use the participants who apart from the aforementioned criterion have a background of being the school principal, being a member of educational groups in the region and in-service teacher. Accordingly, 6 informants had at least one of the aforementioned features apart from the main criterion. Therefore, the sampling method in this study is purposive with the maximum variation sampling. At the beginning of the interviews, after explaining the research purpose and gaining the interviewee’s trust, a general question was asked about the things that elementary school teachers had a negative attitude towards and which of the attitudes is derived from their distrust.  Afterwards, other questions were put forward: why do the distrusts form? Which feelings are cynical teachers engaged in and which behaviors do they take up? Besides, inquiring questions were also asked when necessary to overcome the ambiguities and understand the phenomenon deeper. At the end of each interview, the interview content was examined carefully and printed on paper for content analysis. Coding method at three levels of open coding, axial coding and selective coding was used to analyze each interview.
Data saturation was achieved completely and confidently after interviewing with 14 interviewees. Member control technique was used to ensure the reliability of the data. In addition, to increase the transferability, attempts were made to provide a comprehensive description of the collected data set.
According to the findings, the fundamental issues of organizational cynicism in teachers included 1) cynicism towards colleagues, 2) cynicism towards parents, 3) cynicism towards students, 4) cynicism towards educational issues, 5) cynicism towards plans and programs, and 6) cynicism towards professional development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • cynicism
  • teachers’ organizational cynicism
  • elementary education
  • elementary school teachers
Abdollahi, B., & Alijanyan Nodepashangi, M. (2016). An Explanation of Orientation to Change In Schools Based On Organizational Cynicism and Leadership Style. Journal of School Administration, 4(1), 47-70. (in Persian).

Akin, U. (2015). The relationship between organizational cynicism and trust in schools: A research on teachers. Egitim ve Bilim40(181), 167-183.

Andersson, L.M. (1996), Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.

Ballock, E. E. (2007). “The development and evaluation of a self-study process for critical friends groups", (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University).

Bellini, D., Ramaci, T., & Bonaiuto, M. (2015). The restorative effect of the environment on organizational cynicism and work engagement. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies3(3), 124-135.

Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work. The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Brown, M., & Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management47(4), 667-686.

Davis, J. (2002). At the Mercy of Sadistic Cats and Megalomaniacal Dogs: Dilbert as a Reflection of and Vehicle for Organizational Cynicism.

Dean, J. W. Jr., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of

Management Review, 22, 341-352.

Gündüz, H. B., & Ömür, Y. E. (2016). Supervision anxiety as a predictor for organizational cynicism in teachers. Journal of Human Sciences13(1), 1381-1394.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Educational management, theory, research and practice. Trans. Edt. Turan, S.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing Company.

Hua, H., & Herstein, J. (2003, March). Education management information system (EMIS): Integrated data and information systems and their implications in educational management. In annual conference of comparative and International Education Society (p. 26).

James, M.S.L.(2005). Antecedents and Consequences of Cynicism in organizations: An examination of the potential positive and negativeeffects on school systems. Dissertation submitted to the Department of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The Florida State University, College of business.

Karadag, E., Kilicoglu, G., & Yilmaz, D. (2014). Organizational Cynicism, School Culture, and Academic Achievement: The Study of Structural Equation Modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice14(1), 102-113.

Kasalak, G., & Bilgin Aksu, M. (2014). The Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Cynicism of Research Assistants. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice14(1), 125-133.

Konakli, T. (2016). The Effect of School Administrators' Political Skills against Organizational Cynicism in Educational Organizations. Universal Journal of Educational Research4(3), 589-597.

Levent, F., & Keser, S. (2016). Examining the organizational cynicism among teachers at schools: A mixed methods study. Educational Research and Reviews11(21), 2009.

Mohammadi, T., Hasani, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2019).  Teacher`s Awareness and Attitude towards the Concepts and Commandments of the Fundemental Transformation Document (FTD) of the Ministry of Education in Kurdistan Province. Journal of School Administration,  7(4), 31-57. (in Persian).

Nolan, J., & Hoover, L. (2008). Teacher supervision evaluation: theory into practice, 2nd, Translation Bijan Abdollahi., 2010. Tehran, contemporary works.

Polatcan, M., & Titrek, O. (2014). The relationship between leadership behaviors of school principals and their organizational cynicism attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences141, 1291-1303.

Vakilian, M. (2008). Supervision and guidance educational science, Tehran, Payame Noor University. (in Persian)

Özler, D. E., & Atalay, C. G. (2011). A research to determine the relationship between organizational cynicism and burnout levels of employees in health sector. Business and management review1(4), 26-38.