Evaluation of Green Spaces in the Elementary Schools with an Emotional-Oriented approach

Document Type : Mixed Method Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Pardis Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Pardis Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant professor, Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran Branch, Iran

https://doi.org/10.34785/J010.2021.017

Abstract

Educational environment has always been one of the most important factors that play an important role in learning and education among students and as institutional spaces for learning communities, including students and teachers, that can be used as a tool for teaching. As part of the mechanism for improving student learning, green spaces in primary schools provide a valuable bed for designers and planners to play a role in realization of this goal through providing these spaces. In educational spaces, nature often occurs in a very restricted way, and this limited presence is created without considering the children’s certain needs as well as the natural environments’ high capabilities in meeting these needs. Hence, to reform the body of education, it is essential to create spaces related to student activities, spaces with appropriate and favorable conditions for children’s physical, mental, emotional, and social development, realized by designing the details of the spaces in accordance with the pattern of children’s sentimentality. Considering the creation of a suitable environment for the child’s growth besides getting familiar with his/her needs and pure nature required during his/her childhood, provides the bed for the proper development of the children’s personality and upbringing as a healthy generation of tomorrow. The school is one of these environments, i.e. part of children’s daily lives that has been severely neglected.
In the meantime, the design of green space in primary schools is one of the fields in which sentimental design may be well employed. Emotions are a key part of life affecting how one feels, behaves, and thinks. On the other hand, emotions enhance creativity while increasing one’s ability to enjoy life. In reviewing the current situation of schools in Tehran, it was seen that green space is just considered in open environments; moreover, schools have not taken into account the sentimental approach in design.
The present research seeks to test the interior and exterior spaces of green primary schools in terms of sentimental approach experimentally. This is an applied study in terms of purpose, with a mixed approach (qualitative-quantitative). The approach of the current study is to investigate the importance of primary school’s indoor and outdoor spaces with a sentimental approach. To this end, we try to prioritize these spaces as a solution to make better use of schools and help students’ progress and academic motivation. In the qualitative phase, library studies were employed for obtaining information about educational space and green spaces, besides getting familiar with the sentimental approach and its related components; then, the relevant theories were collected from books, papers, journals, and dissertations. Library studies revealed that school design could promote growth or inhibit learning. Architectural designers should consider how to design the schools’ natural space and the quality of the presence of nature. The presence of nature and its designers’ strategies may affect the quality of children’s education and green space may be employed as a tool for the child’s learning and multi-faceted growth. The questionnaire and the interview resulted in six indicators for studying the primary schools’ green space, given the students’ sentimentality. These indicators include entrance green space, closed educational space, breeding space, open spaces, rest and sitting spaces, and educational space in nature.
In the quantitative phase, these extracted framework and components had to be approved by a group of experts in the education field. Accordingly, a pairwise comparison questionnaire was designed with the statistical population consisting of managers, experts, education specialists, and teachers. Purposive sampling method was used in this phase and 180 people were studied. Fuzzy AHP method was employed for ranking and statistical analysis. Given the ranking results, it can be claimed that the presence of green space in the library may contribute to the scientific level and greater effectiveness of the school in learning; since along the way of green spaces, students can have access to different books and enhance their level of learning. On the other hand, considering the children’s sentimentality, green space in school gyms may contribute to motivate students more and make them more interested in learning; then this is very significant in design. The design of green space in classrooms in the right environment as much as possible may help students’ learning. The indoor and outdoor spaces are mixed in such a way that the child can satisfy many of his/her needs in that space including discovering the unknown and curiosity about it, initiation, creativity, experiential learning, etc.
Besides considering physical standards and physiological needs, students’ mental inclinations should be considered in creating an educational environment. As one of the factors in increasing the quality of education, investigating sentimentality is a considerable and significant discussion. It seems that the time has come for other architects to think about the users’ characteristics and quality needs in education, in addition to the quantitative aspects of education. Hence, using the opinions of the expert professors and managers of various organizations and institutions, the present research revealed that considering the users’ needs, feelings, and moods will not only improve the students’ level of learning at the physical and quantitative levels, but also meeting these needs will lead to the users’ satisfaction and peace of mind. Constant communication with natural environments results in a positive emotional attraction to nature and formal and informal experiences that children gain from the environment will have a great impact on their environmental learning.
The researcher designed and distributed a pairwise comparison questionnaire among them. Using the experts’ opinions, six indicators were found to study the primary schools’ green space. These indicators include entrance green space, closed educational space, breeding space, open spaces, rest and sitting spaces, and educational space in nature. Given the ranking results, the priority of creating green spaces by considering the three dimensions of instinct, behavior, and reflection may be expressed as library indexes, sports halls, and finally classrooms as the first, second, and third priority. Considering the significance of the effect of contextual, behavioral, and social factors and students’ sentimentality in learning, the officials and designers are recommended to use this research’s results in reviewing and compiling green space with a sentimental approach.

Keywords


Acharya, K. P. (2019). Demystifying Science Teachers' Epistemic Belief on Chemical Concepts: Students' Engagement in the School Garden. Pedagogical Research, 4(4). ‏
Ahmad, M. (2020). Urban Women, Their Religion, and Response to Environmental Crisis: Empirical Evidence in Green School and Majlis Taklim Ulin Nuha. Muwazah, 12(1), 33-52. ‏(in Persian)
Ahmadi, A., & Jabbarifar, T. (2017). "Green schools, green education and their impact on environmental sustainability", 1st National Conference on Social Sciences, Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Security. ‏(in Persian)
Browning, M. H., & Rigolon, A. (2019). "School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review". International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 429. ‏
Burt, K., G. Koch, P., & Contento, I. (2017). Development of the GREEN (Garden Resources, Education, and Environment Nexus) tool: an evidence-based model for school garden integration. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(10), 1517-1527. ‏
Christodoulou, A., & Korfiatis, K. (2019). Children's interest in school garden projects, environmental motivation and intention to act: A case study from a primary school of Cyprus. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(1), 2-12. ‏
Cramer, S. E., Ball, A. L., & Hendrickson, M. K. (2019). “Our school system is trying to be agrarian”: educating for reskilling and food system transformation in the rural school garden. Agriculture and Human Values, 36(3), 507-519. ‏
Cobb, E. (1977). The ecology of imagination in childhood, 1st, New York, Colombia University Press.
Diaz, J. M., Warner, L. A., & Webb, S. T. (2018). Outcome Framework for School Garden Program Development and Evaluation: A Delphi Approach. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 143-165. ‏
 Fjortoft, I. (2004). Landscape as Playspace: The Effects of Natural Environments on Children's Play and Motor Development. Children, Youth and Environments, 2, 14, 21-44.
 Gordon, D. E. (2010). Green Schools as High Performance Learning Facilities.Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Retrieved on March 23, 2012, from http://www.ncef.org/pubs/greenschools.pdf
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., & Suwandi, T. (2020). Implementation Supplementary Book of Green Consumerism: Improving Students HOTS in Environmental Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 227-237. ‏
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Azrai, E. P., & Heryanti, E. (2019). Students’ pro-environmental behavior and environmental learning outcomes based on green consumerism. JPBI (Journal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 109-116.
Safari, z., & MalekMahmoodi, R. (2011). Green School, Sustainable Apporach in Desiging Educational Centers,2nd Conference on Sustainable Architecture, Hamedan.
Johnson, J., & Janko, S.S. (1998). ‘Designing School Sites and Surrounds as Learning Environments’, ASLA Annual Meeting Proceedings. Washington, DC: American Society of Landscape Architects.
Kerlin, Steve, Rosie Santos and William Bennet (2015) Green Schools as Learning   Laboratories Teachers’ Perceptions of Their First Year in a New Green Middle School, the Journal of sustainability education, JANUARY 14TH, 2015.
Lohr, A. M., Henry, N., Roe, D. Rodriguez, C., Romero, R., & Ingram, M. (2020). Evaluation of the Impact of School Garden Exposure on Youth Outlook and Behaviors toward Vegetables in Southern Arizona. Journal of School Health. ‏
Meybodi, H. (2016). Green Schools: A New Approach in Education of the Country. ‏(in Persian)
 Meybodi, H., Lahijanian, A., Shabiri, S.M., Jozi, S.A., & Azizinejad, R. (2016) Compilation of Green Schools Standards in Iran, Quarterly Journal of Education, 32nd Year, No. 3. ‏(in Persian)
Meybodi, Hossein, Omidvar, Babak, Enayati, Ashraf Sadat, Rashidi, Sahar (2013) Does the type of school make a difference in the environmental awareness of elementary students? (in Persian)
Mozaffar, F., & Feizi, M. (2010).  Contemporary Approaches in Environmental Researches of Urban Open Spaces", Amayesh Mohit Quarterly, No. 21. ‏(in Persian)
Mozaffar, F., Mehdizadeh Seraj, F., & Mirmoradi, S. (2009). Recognition of nature's role in educational spaces Journal of Education Technology, 4th Year, No. 1. ‏(in Persian).
Moslem, H. (2012). Design of Middle School Garden in Rey, Based on Socialization Criteria, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. ‏(in Persian).
Norman, D. (2003). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, 1st, United States, Basic Books.
Rees-Punia, E., Holloway, A., Knauft, D., & Schmidt, M. D. (2017). Effects of school gardening lessons on elementary school children’s physical activity and sedentary time. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 14(12), 959-964. ‏
Ramli, N. H., Masri, M. H., Zafrullah, M., Taib, H. M., & Abd Hamid, N. (2012). A comparative study of green school guidelines. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 462-471.
Salehifard, M., khakpour, B., Rafiyei, H., & Tavanghar, M. (2010). An Analysis on the Social Dimensions of Urban Green Spaces with an Emphasis on the Perspective of Citizens., Journal of Geographical Space. (11), 5658-59-62. (in Persian)
Safari, Z., & Malek Mahmoodi, R. (2011). Green School, Sustainable Approach in Designing Educational Centers, 2nd Conference on Sustainable Architecture. ‏ (in Persian)
Selmer, S., Valentine, K., Luna, M., Rummel, S., & Rye, J. (2016). How Can We Best Use Our School Garden Space? Exploring the Concepts of Area and Perimeter in an Authentic Learning Context. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(4), 3-10.
Sundari, S., Abdurrahman, A., Hariri, H., Karwan, D., & Rahman, B. (2020, June). School-based quality improvement management for creating green school in central Lampung secondary schools. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1572, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing.
TaherTolodel, M., & Tabesh, M. (2017). Indicators of Designing Educational Environments for Environmental Learning.
Tanner C. K. (2015). Green School Characteristics, Sustainability, and Student Learning. 10.4018/978-1-4666-6312-1.ch003.
Turner, L., Eliason, M., Sandoval, A., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2016). Increasing prevalence of US elementary school gardens, but disparities reduce opportunities for disadvantaged students. Journal of School Health, 86(12), 906-912. ‏
‏Wong, D.L. (1997) ‘Essentials of Pediatric Nursing (5th ed.)’, St. Luis: Mosby Year Book, Inc.