بازنمایی عوامل، ملاک‌ها و نشانگرهای مدارس اثربخش دورۀ ابتدایی: یک مطالعۀ کیفی

نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی (کیفی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دوره دکتری رشته سنجش و اندازه گیری، دانشگاه‌ تهران

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه خوارزمی

4 استادیار گروه روش‌ها و برنامه‌های آموزشی و درسی، دانشگاه تهران

5 دانشیار گروه روش‌ها و برنامه‌های آموزشی و درسی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

    پژوهش حاضر مبتنی بر رویکرد تحقیق کیفیو با روش پدیدارشناسی توصیفی انجام شد. بدین‌منظور با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری ملاکی و مصاحبه­ی نیمه‌ساختاریافته با 15 مشارکت­کننده، داده­ها گردآوری شد و به روش کُلایزی تحلیل گردید. به­منظور باورپذیری یافته­ها از سه روش ممیزی بیرونی، بازبینی نتایج توسط اطلاع‌رسان‌ها و درگیری طولانی مدتاستفاده‌ شد. نتایج پژوهش، به شناسایی و دسته‌بندی 6 عامل، 16 ملاک و 111 نشانگر برای اندازه‌گیری اثربخشی مدارس در دوره­ی ابتدایی منتج گردید. یافته­ها بر نقش سازنده­­ی مدیر مدرسه، تعامل بین مدیر، معلمان، والدین و دانش‌آموزان، مشارکت معلمان در تصمیم‌گیری‌ها و تعامل مؤثر بین جامعه و مدرسه تأکید داشتند. به نظر می‌رسد با توجه به جامعیت و تناسب عوامل، ملاک‌ها و نشانگرهای شناسایی‌شده با وضعیت مدارس دوره­ی ابتدایی، استفاده از آن بتواند زمینه­ی لازم برای ساخت ابزار مناسب اندازه‌گیری کیفیت مدارس دوره­ی ابتدایی، تعیین وضعیت این مدارس و ارائه­ی راهکارهای بهبود را فراهم سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Representation of factors, criteria and indicators of effective primary schools: a qualitative study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Pirhayati 1
  • Keyvan Salehi 2
  • Vali Allah Farzad 3
  • Ali Moghadamzadeh 4
  • Rezvan Hakim Zade 5
1 PhD Candidate in Educational Measurement and Evaluation, University of Tehran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Curriculum Development & Instruction Methods, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Methods and Curriculums, University of Tehran
5 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Methods and Curriculums, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

Ensuring a quality education system is the main pioneer in socio-economic, cultural, and political developments in each society. Analysis of factors shaping growth and development in advanced societies means that all these countries are benefiting effective and efficient education. Given the undeniable importance of education and its relationship with development types in human societies as well as the nature of education goals, each society has particular attention and sensitivity to schools and how to manage them; therefore, school activities and performance are directly and indirectly monitored, evaluated, and judged. Considering their sensitivity as well as significance of education quality and its impact on children’s future, parents are eager to send their children to schools having good and effective performance according to their research. This tendency goes so far that they accept costs and difficulties of commutes and transports to use certain school services. Despite the importance of effective schools as thriving environments with value-creating processes facilitating grounds to achieve strategic goals in each country; enough studies have not been conducted hitherto to identify metrics to assess such schools in Iran. This study was to explain the concept of effective schools, identify their indicators, investigate perceptions and living experiences of a group of successful executives and thematic experts, and then analyze convergence or divergence of opinions to propose measurable indicators of effective primary schools and ways to improve their quality. The present study was based on a qualitative research approach using descriptive phenomenology. Criterion sampling method was also used to select the participants. Data collection was also fulfilled through semi-structured interviews via exploratory approach. To guide the interviews in an organized and effortless manner, a protocol was set. The interviews were performed in three forms; face-to-face, written, and social networking i.e. Telegram and then recorded. In order to observe research ethics and to fulfill initial obligations to ensure anonymity, findings from interviews were classified without participants’ names and encoded. The interviews varied from 40 to 90 minutes. The face-to-face interviews were conducted during the day, set according to interviewees’ preferences. After collecting the forms for data analysis, they were immediately reviewed after each interview to adjust and complete them and also encode them. Within the data analysis, seven-step Colaizzi’s method was employed. Moreover, three methods of external audit, review of results by informants, and long-term immersion were utilized to make the findings much credible. In-depth analysis of opinions by experts, administrators, and university teachers about factors associated with school effectiveness resulted in identification of 6 factors i.e. individual factors, school interactions, educational factors, managerial factors, environmental factors, culture and school climate; 16 criteria, and 111 indicators. Based on interviewees’ perspectives, individual factors were comprised of 4 criteria of administrator’s characteristics, teacher’s characteristics, student’s characteristics, and parents’ characteristics; school interactions encompassed 2 criteria of parent-school and society-school interactions; educational factors were made up of 4 criteria of teaching quality and teacher education, educational content and curriculum, students’ performance evaluation, and students’ tasks; managerial factors had 2 criteria of educational and executive leadership; environmental factors contained 2 criteria including school architecture and physical properties and aesthetic principles of school space; and culture and school climate had 2 criteria including culture and education and school climate. According to participants’ opinions, an effective school could pay much attention to upbringing along with in-depth and sustainable education and also teach students to live better in the future and have individual and social skills. These schools also aim to make favorable changes in students in the form of ethical, theological, scientific, political, cultural, and economic objectives. So, an effective school can lead students towards these goals and also help them to get the least amount of expected results. What are emphasized in effective schools as performance indicators are not scores and one-dimensional goals, but there should be attempts to get the maximum from the minimum facilities. Tools and educational facilities, parents, and teachers should be also used to improve education in students and to grant the highest quality to students in cognitive and metacognitive domains through adopting right financial policies. As metacognition and skill training are raised, parents and teachers can be similarly engaged in decision-making in the general policy of school annual planning. Almost all the participants pointed out the constructive and effective role of interactions between administrators, teachers, parents, and students; teachers’ involvement in decision-making, extensive relationships between schools and parents, as well as effective society-school interactions. Teachers also emphasized that creating an effective school needed avoiding focus on students’ scores but concentrating on students’ actual learning via frequent evaluations. In order to improve the quality of existing primary schools, it was proposed to consider plurality (different cultures, ethnicities, languages, religions, and geographies) in the development of objectives and contents of textbooks. Educational content should be task-oriented, skill-centered, based on students’ needs, innovative, and also on the basis of characteristics as well as cognitive, psychological, and physical structure in students and according to the time assigned. Moreover, it is of double importance to develop a reward system for effective schools before their formation. Instead of too much attention to assessment of school effectiveness, there should be a focus on creation and development of effective schools to improve school atmosphere, leading to effectiveness and efficiency. Overall, formation of effective schools is not consistent with common approaches of positivism in content development and increased volume of books and subjects. To pave the grounds for the establishment of effective schools, qualitative approaches to interpretation are necessary. The main recipients of research results on school effectiveness are teachers since they can have access to rich conceptual information that can make varied student-to-student and program-to-program consequences understood. So, it is recommended to pay enough attention to the constructive role and value of teachers in the domain of school effectiveness. To create effective schools, there is also a need to have lively environments to provide grounds for fostering learners with high self-esteem who interact constructively with other students and get actively involved in decision-making. Considering the comprehensiveness and fitness of the factors, indicators, and criteria identified for the status of primary schools; it seems that using them can provide grounds for developing a useful tool to measure the quality of effective primary schools, specify their status, and propose improvement strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Effective Schools
  • School Effectiveness
  • Factors
  • Criteria
  • Indicators
Abbasian, H., & Rajabi-Firoozabadi, A. (2015). The role of group organizational citizenship behavior of teachers in effectiveness of elemntary schools. Scientific-Research Bi-Quarterly Journal of School Management, 4 (2), 109-121.

Act, council of P&S association. (2005). Working with schools characteristics of effective schools, Ministry of American education.

Adib, Y., & Mardan-Arbat, F. (2017). Parents’ experiences of involvement in their children’s education: A qualitative study. Shahid Chamran University Journal of Education, 2 (8), 51-69.

Akan, D. (2017). Effective school evaluation in primary schools from the dimension of parents. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(1), 134-140, Doi:10.11114/jets.v5i1.2094.

Amerifard, F., & Jahani, J. (2013). Relationship between organizational culture and school effectiveness from the perspective of principals and teachers of secondary schools in the city of Shiraz. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Management, 4 (3), 155-170.

Atai, F., Shamsa, A., Bahri, M., & Salari, I. (2015). The effect of family-school relationship on academic achievement. Presented at the First International Conference on Management, Accounting, Education, and Resistance Economy: Action and Practice (IC2016), Sari: Baran-e-Andished Scientific Research Company.

Azigwe, J. B., Kyriakides, L., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. (2016). The impact of effective teaching characteristics in promoting student achievement in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 51-61, Doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.07.004.

Bahamonde, G., & Mayday, A. (2002), Teachers Perceptions of school culture in Relation to schools Effectiveness. Western Michigan University.

Bakirci, H., Turkdogan, A., & Guler, M. (2012). Is my school an effective school? Headmaster and teacher views. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3471 – 3476, Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.087.

Bani-Assad, Sh., Hussein-Qolizadeh, R., & Amin-Khandaqi, M. (2017). From effectiveness to excellence: Discretion of theory, research, and practice in an excellence program for school management. Research Journal of Foundations of Education and Training, 7 (2), 124-148.

Bazargan, A. (2011). An Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research: Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences, Tehran: Didar Publications.

Bellei, C., Vanni, X., Valenzuela, J.P., & Contreras, D. (2015). School improvement trajectories: an empirical typology. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Doi: 10.1080/09243453.2015.1083038.

Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement: Research, policy, and practice. Routledge.

Cibulka, J., & Nakayama, M. (2000). The creation of high performance schools through organizational and individual learning: A practitioner’s guide to learning communities. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.

Creemers, B. P. (2002). The comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: Background, major assumptions and description. Accessed January,22, 2010.

Creemers, B. P. (2002). The comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: Background, major assumptions and description. Retrieved January22, 2010.

Creemers, B.P.M., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). Improving Quality in Education: DynamicApproaches to School Improvement. Routledge, London.

Creemers, B.P.M., & Kyriakides, L. (2015). School Improvement. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 91-95.

Cyril, A. V., & Jeyasekaran, D. (2016). Attitude towards Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation of High School Students. Journal on Educational Psychology, 9(4), 21-26.

De Jong, R., Westerhof, K.J., & Kruiter, J.H. (2004). Empirical Evidence of a Comprehensive Model of School Effectiveness: A Multilevel Study in Mathematics in the 1st Year of Junior General Education in the Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 3–31, Doi: 10.1076/sesi.15.1.3.27490.

Department of Education and Training Melbourne. (2005). Leadership and Teacher Development Branch Effective of School Education. Available at: https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx

DÖŞ, İ. (2014). Some Model Suggestions for Measuring Effective Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1454 – 1458, Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.415.

Elgart, M. A. (2017). Can schools meet the promise of continuous improvement? Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 54–59.

Fazli, R. (2010). Classroom space and educational quality. Growth (Elementary Education), 12 (8), 20-23.

Greb, W. (2011). Principal leadership and student achievement: What is the effect of transformational leadership in conjunction with instructional leadership on student achievement? (Doctoral dissertation, Marian University).

Ghanbari, S., Ardalan, M. R., & Mohammadi, B. (2014). Examining relationship between emotional intelligence, creativity, and organizational effectiveness in secondary schools in the city of Sanandaj. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Humanities, 4 (2), 135-151.

Habibi, H., Pardaktchi, M. H., Abolghasemi, M., & Qahremani, M. (2011). Investigating learning-centered atmosphere in schools and its relationship with school effectiveness. Scientific-Research Bi-Quarterly Journal of Shahed University Research, 20 (3), 101-118.

Hassanpour, A., Mohammad-Khanlou, M., & Saeedi, Y. (2015). Comparing effectiveness of public and private elementary schools in the city of Qazvin. Islamic Azad University of Garmsar Quarterly Journal of Leadership and Educational Management, 10 (2), 27-49.

Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., & Gray, J. M. (2008). Comparing key dimensions of schooling: Towards a typology of European school systems. Comparative Education, 44, 93–110. Doi: 10.1080/03050060701809508.

Imam-Jom’eh, M. R., Keramat, A., & Saki, R. (2015). Relationship between thoughtful leadership and effectiveness of elementary schools in the city of Shahr-e-Quds based on Parsons’ Model. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Management, 7 (4), 149-168.

Imani, M. N., & Mohammadi, F. (2011). Identifying qualities of empowered schools and their adaptation with secondary education in the city of Tehran. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Educational Management Studies, 3 (4), 71-106.

Izadi, S., Hashemi, S., & Barzamini, L. (2012). Factors contributing to liveliness of schools from the perspective of students and parents: An emphasis on cultural development. Quarterly Journal of Social-Cultural Development Studies, 1 (1), 91-118.

Johnson, N. A., & Holdaway, E. A. (1990). Effectiveness of primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 4(3), 4-11.

Johnson, N.A., & Holdaway, E.A. (1991). Perceptions of Effectiveness and the Satisfaction of Principals in Elementary Schools. Educational Administration, 29(1), 51-70, Doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002468.

Khalkhali, A. (2015). Variety of the concept of effectiveness in schools. School Management Growth, 14 (3), 8-9.

Kirk, D. J., & Jones, T. L. (2004). Effective schools. Tersedia: www. pearsonasses. com [22 Juli 2013].

Lezotte, L. (2001). Revolutionary and evolutionary: The effective schools movement. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products, Ltd.

Lotf-Ata, A. (2008). The impact of environmental factors on learning and behaviors in educational contexts (elementary schools) within city. Quarterly Journal of Urban Management, 21, 73-90.

Mirghafoori, S. H., Shabani, A., Mohammadi, Kh., & Mansouri-Mohammad-Abadi, S. (2016). Identifying and ranking factors affecting quality of educational services using integrated fuzzy VIKOR method and interpretive structural modeling. Scientific-Research Journal of Education and Evaluation, 9 (34), 13-33.

Mohammadi, M., Mirzamani, S. M., & Azadyekta, M. (2015). Relationship between managers’ creativity and effectiveness of teachers in elementary schools for girls in the city of Robat Karim. Quarterly Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 4 (16), 25-38.

Naqavi, N., Azari, H., & Lesani, M. (2013). Relationship between managers’ self-esteem and effectiveness of secondary schools in the city of Kerman in 2011-2012. Modern Educational Thoughts, 9 (3), 131-153.

Niknami, M., & Mahdian, J. (2009). Explaining dimensions and components of effective schools and presenting a model to improve effectiveness in Iranian schools. Quarterly Journal of Leadership and Educational Management, 3 (1), 175-202.

Pahang, N., Mahdyion, R., & Yari-Qoli, B. (2017). Testing quality of schools and identifying effective factors: A combined research. Scientific-Research Bi-Quarterly Journal of School Management, 1, 173-193.

Papanastasiou, C. (2008). A residual analysis of effective schools and effective teaching in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 24–30. Doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.01.005.

Postlethwaite, T.N., & Ross, K.N. (1992). Effective Schools in Reading: Implications for Educational Planners. An Exploratory Study. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievemen. ISBN-92-9121-003-3.

Rahimian, H. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of Allameh Schools in the city of Tehran in the context of effective school research. Allameh Tabataba’i University Quarterly Journal of Leadership and Educational Management, 2 (8), 51-69.

Ramberg, J., Brolin Låftman, S., Fransson, E., & Modin, B. (2018). School effectiveness and truancy: a multilevel study of upper secondary schools in Stockholm. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1-14. Doi: 10.1080/02673843.2018.1503085.

Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2002). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Routledge.

Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Nesselrodt, P. S., Shaffer, E. C., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2014). Advances in school effectiveness research and practice. Elsevier.

Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197-230.

Sackney, L. (2007). History of the school effectiveness and improvement movement in Canada over the past 25 years. InInternational Handbook Effectiveness andImprovement (pp. 167-182). Springer Netherlands.

Safi, A. (2012). Iran’s education over the last century. Growth of Academic-Educational Guidance, 2 (18), 48-64.

Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.

Scheerens, J. (2015). School Effectiveness Research. InternationalEncyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, 21. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92080-4.

Shaibani, S., & Aflakifard, H. (2013). Investigating factors affecting improvement of educational quality in middle schools in the city of Shiraz from the perspective of teachers. Presented at the First National Conference on Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz.

Sisman, M. (2011). The pursuit of excellence in education, effective schools. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.

Teodorović, J. (2011). Classroom and school factors related to student achievement: what works for students? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 215–236. Doi: 10.1080/09243453.2011.575650.

Tola, B. (2014). Effective School Evaluation Model: A Development Study. Journalof Modern Education Review, 4(9), 679–691. Doi: 10.15341/jmer (2155 7993)/09.04.2014/004.

Vaezi, M., Hosseini, S. R., & Amir-Hosseini, A. (2009). Investigating relationship between behavioral components in managers and effectiveness in high schools of the city of Tehran. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. 39 (2), 13-30.

Walker, W., Hughes, M., & Farquhar, R. (2018). Advancing education: school leadership in action. Routledge.

Zaki, M. A. (2010). Organizational effectiveness factors in schools and their relationships with teachers’ educational characteristics. Imam Hussein University (AS) Journal of Humanities and Islamic Education (10), 18 (80), 161-194.

Zebardast, M. A., Gholami, Kh., & Nemati, S. (2014). The impact of distributed leadership style in managers on effectiveness of schools mediated by teachers’ motivation and their academic optimism in secondary schools in the city of Sanandaj: Presenting a model. Scientific-Research Journal of Study on School-Based and Virtual Learning, 2 (7), 7-26.