Structural Relationship of Knowledge Sharing with Effectiveness of School Educational Groups: Mediating Role of In-group Trust and Intra-group Collaboration

Document Type : Quantitative Research Paper

Authors

1 دانش‌آموخته مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 استاد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

https://doi.org/10.34785/J010.2020.174

Abstract

Pundits of education believe that quality and effectiveness in education requires the existence of educational groups in all areas regarding teaching-learning processes. This needs especially acute when education undergoes fundamental changes, because educational groups play an essential role in guiding and enhancing teaching-learning processes and making desirable changes in educational systems. Hence, the performance of educational groups, active in the field of education, is considered as part of quality assurance programs and the effectiveness of education for the purpose of improvement and growth of teachers'' professions. The performance of educational groups in providing educational services to teachers is a way for their professional growth and improvement in order to achieve the basic benefits (vision, value, mission, goals, etc.) of education, i.e. to enhance teachers’ performance quality and consequently the growth and development of the educational system. School educational groups, as a link related to educational factors, teachers and students have a sympathetic and special place in achieving educational goals. Wu & Short (1996) believe that education as one of the most significant social institutions plays a pivotal role in longevity and development of each society through teaching children and future-makers of that society. Among them, teachers as human resources and implementers of education and training programs are its essential elements, and their performance plays a major role in the success of this institution. Therefore, in trying to improve the quality of education, more focus should be placed on teachers and the organizational aspects that affect their work in schools. This is based on an assumption that understanding the factors affecting teacher performance increases our knowledge of how schools improve. The goal of present study is investigate the structural relationship of knowledge sharing with effectiveness of school educational groups by mediating in-group trust and intra-group collaboration of teachers of three educational levels of schools in Babol. Present study is a practical research on the basis of purpose and is a type of descriptive-correlative researches on the basis of data collection method.
Methods: The statistical population of this study includes all primary and secondary first and second school teachers (n=3100, m=1426, f=1674) in the school year 2017-18. Given the assumed methods, 9 parameters should be estimated, including 3 parameters in gamma matrix, 2 parameters in beta matrix, 3 parameters in WiFi matrix and 1 parameter in Sai matrix. Accordingly, the sample size should be at least 5 to 50 times more than the desired parameters (Müller, 1996).  Based on the number of parameters existing in the model, a sample of 200 people was selected using stratified random sampling. They included 200 primary and secondary first and second school teachers in Babol (m=82, 41%; f=118, 59%).
In the study sample, the average effectiveness of school education groups (M = 3.918) in a range of 5 points shows that the sample teachers evaluated the effectiveness of school educational groups above the average level. Also, the average knowledge sharing, intra-group trust and intra-group cooperation were estimated above average. All the teachers of study sample completed the questionnaires of knowledge sharing, in-group trust, intra-group collaboration and effectiveness of school educational groups. In order to test the reliability of these instruments, Cronbach’s alpha was used. The data was analyzed through structural equation model and by SPSS and LISREL software.
Results: The findings showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between knowledge sharing, in-group trust and intra-group collaboration with effectiveness of school educational groups. Knowledge sharing has a direct and significant effect on effectiveness of educational groups. Also, knowledge sharing with mediating the in-group trust has an indirect and significant effect on effectiveness of school educational groups. Knowledge sharing with mediating the intra-group collaboration has an indirect and significant effect on effectiveness of school educational groups. The results of this study indicated the importance of paying attention to the role of knowing sharing, in-group trust and intra-group collaboration of teachers in increasing the effectiveness of  school educational groups.
Discussion and conclusion: In general, based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the sharing of knowledge, trust and cooperation within the group will increase the effectiveness of school educational groups and in turn results in improvement and enhancement of the education system.  Knowledge sharing in educational groups along with close cooperation and trust among teachers in return for this knowledge sharing and cooperation in the exchanged information has increased the effectiveness and performance of teachers, which, in turn, leads to the growth and development of their professions and the results will be reflected in improving the empowerment of students. Finally, it is suggested that the educational groups and related meetings be equipped with the appropriate tools and technology to perform the assigned tasks so that teachers are able to participate in the groups in a real and virtual method to share their knowledge and information. In this way, they can pursue the acquisition of information and knowledge through other members of the group. Education officials are encouraged to use brochures, booklets and posters to inform teachers about the impact of collaboration, teamwork and the sharing of knowledge and trusting each other and its positive effects on improving the process of group work and training sessions. Also, by creating a friendly and informal atmosphere in education contributes to more communication among teachers and strengthens their cooperation. Furthermore, using the guidelines of experienced and knowledgeable educational groups, they can overcome the problems arising during the work. It is necessary to create a culture of trust, participation and cooperation and their goals in improving and enhancing nationwide educational centers and schools, and of course, the cooperation of the mass media will be fruitful in this regard. Incorporating internet for sharing knowledge in school educational groups and the free use of virtual chat rooms so that teachers can easily exchange information and knowledge and have shares in each other''s knowledge

Keywords

References

Ahmadi, E., Majid Barzegar, M., &  Ezadi, M. (2013). The Relationship between Organizational Structure with Organizational Effectiveness and Empowerment of Employees in Different Regions of Ministry of Education in Shiraz. Journal of Educational Management Innovations, 3(8), 7-18. [in Persian].
Ali  Pourdorvishi,  Z.  (2012).  Presenting  a  model  of  effective  factors  on knowledge  sharing  in  the  departments  of  Islamic  Azad  University  (survey  on North  Tehran  branch  and  science  and  research).  Information  Technology Management,  4 (10), 116-91.  [in  Persian].
Alizadeh Thani,  M.,  Yahya  Zadehfar,  M.,  &  Hassanzadeh,  M.  (2014).  The effect  of  perceived diversity  on team  financial  performance:  The moderating  role of  organizational  trust.  Organizational  Behavior  Studies,  3  (4,11),  195-173.  [in Persian].
Alsharo,  M.,  Gregg,  D.,  &  Ramirez,  R.  (2017). Virtual  team  effectiveness: The  role  of  knowledge  sharing  and  trust.  Information  &  Management,  54,  479490.
Aram,  J.  D.,  &  Morgan,  C.  P.  (1976),  The  role  of  project  team collaboration  in R&D  performance.  Management  Science, 22(10),  1127-1137.
Bazrafshan  Moghadam,  M.,  Shoghi,  M.,  &  Rahmankhah,  R.  (2015).  The position  of  educational  supervision  and  guidance  in  the  document  of  fundamental change  in  education.  Journal  of  Fundamentals  of  Education,  5  (2),  43-23.  [in Persian].
Casimir, G.,  Lee,  K., &  Loon, M.  (2012).  Knowledge  sharing:  influences of  trust,  commitment  and  cost.  Journal  of  knowledge  management,  16(5),  740753.
Chang,  L.  Ch.,  &  Liu,  Ch.  H.  (2008).  Employee  empowerment, innovative  behavior  and  job  productivity  of  public  health  nurses:  a  cross-sectional questionnaire  survey.  International  Journal  of  Nursing Studies, 45, 1442–1448.
Chathoth,  P.,  Mak,  B.,  Sim,  J.,  Jauhari,  V.,  &  Manaktola,  K.  (2011). Assessing  dimensions  of  organizational  trust  across  cultures:  A  comparative analysis  of  U.S.  and  Indian  full  service  hotels.  International  Journal  of  Hospitality Management,  30, 233-242.
Chen,  C.  J.,  &  Huang,  J.  W.  (2009).  Strategic  human  resource  practices and  innovation  performance—the  mediating  role  of  knowledge  management capacity.  Journal  of  business  research, 62(1), 104-114.
Chen,  C.  J.,  &  Hung,  J.  W.  (2007).  How  Organizational  Climate  and Structure  Affect  Knowledge  Management.  International  Journal  of  Information Management,  2, 27,  104-118.
Chin,  T.  Ch,  (2009).  Study  of  the  correlations  between  the  knowledge management  and  the  administrative  effectiveness  of  general  affairs  office  in  the elementary  schools  in  Taoyuan  country.  Master's  Thesis"  Department  GradEducation.  Page Count.  156.
Colquitt,  J.  A.,  Scott,  B.  A.,  Rodell,  J.  B.,  Long,  D.  M.,  Zapata,  C.P., Conlon,  D.  E.,  &  Wesson,  M.  J.,  (2013).  Justice  at  the  millennium,  a  decade  later: A meta-analytic  test  of  social  exchange  and  affect-based  perspectives.  Journal  of Applied Psychology,  98, 199–236.
Daniels, F. M., & Khanyile, T. D. (2013). A framework for effective collaboration: A case study of collaboration in nursing education in the Western Cape, South Africa. Nurse education today, 33(9), 956-961.
Dastan, N., Insafadaran, F., Shahbazi, M., & Refahi, J. (2016). Investigating the predictive factors in building trust in the relationship between principals and teachers of theoretical high schools for girls. Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 7 (25), 47-62. [in Persian].
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA in Alvesson M (2002), Understanding Organizational Culture, Sage publications, London.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1, 113-127.
Ghasemzadeh, A., Zavvar, T., & Foladvand, Z. (2020). The Relationship between School Principals’ Development and Self-efficacy with the Effectiveness of High Schools. Journal of School Administration, 8(2), 300-320.
Hislop, D. (2003). Linking Human Resource Management and Knowledge Management via Commitment: A Review and Research Agenda. Employee Relations, 25,182-202.
Hong, D., Suh, E., & Koo, Ch. (2011). Developing strategies for overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing based on conversational knowledge management: A Case Study of a Financial Company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14417–14427.
Hooff, B., & Husman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches. Information and Management, 46, 1-8.
Hsu, I. C. (2008). Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: A preliminary test. Expert Systems with Applications 35(3), 1316-1326.
Huang, C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: an empirical study of technology R & D teams in Taiwan. Journal of Tec novation, 20, 786-797.
Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-45.
Ismaili, M. R.; Amiri, Z., & Farrokhi, M. (2016). The Impact of Shared Leadership on the Effectiveness of a Mediating Working Group: Knowledge Sharing. Organizational Behavior Studies (Special Issue), 4 (5) 50-25. [in Persian].
Jafari, S., & Asgari, A. (2020). Predicting Students' Academic Achievement based on the Classroom Climate, Mediating Role of Teacher Student  Interaction  and  Academic  Motivation.  Integration  of  Education,  24(1), 62-74.
Jafari,  H.,  Mohammadian,  M.,  &  Pour,  D.  H.  (2012).  Organizational Health  and  its  Relation  to  Organizational  Commitment  in  Personnel  of  Selected Teaching  Hospitals  Affiliated  with  of  Medical  Sciences:  2011.  Jundishapur Journal  of  Health Sciences,  4(1),  45-58.
Jafari,  S,  Damghanian,  H.,  &  Abdolsharifi,  F.  (2017).  The  structural relationship  between  the  role  of  educational  departments  and  the  quality  of teachers'  teaching.  Education  and  learning  of  Shiraz  University,  9(2),  37-58.  [in Persian].
Jarvenpaa,  S.,  &  Leidner,  D.  (1999).  Communication  and  Trust  in  Global Virtual  Teams, 10,  Organization Science, 6, 791–815.
Law,  C.,  &  Ngai,  E.  (2008).  An  Empirical  Study  of  the  Effect  of Knowledge  Sharing  and  Learning  on  Farm  Performance,  Expert  System  with Application,  34, 2342-2349.
Lin,  T.  C.  &  Hung,  C.  C.  (2009).  Understanding  social  loafing  in knowledge  contribution  from  the  perspective  of  justice  and  trust,  Expert  System with Application,  36, 6156-  6163.
Lurey,  J.  S.,  &  Raising  hani,  M.  S.  (2001).  An  empirical  study  of  best practices  in virtual  teams.  Information  &  Management,  38(8), 523-544.
Marzooqi,  R.,  &  Heidari,  E.  (2016).  Measuring  causal  relationships  of regulatory  violations, perception of  organizational  justice  and knowledge sharing behavior  (Case  study  of  Shiraz  University  of  Medical  Sciences  staff).  Health Information  Management,  19 (64), 30-19.  [in Persian].
Mayer,  R.  C.,  Davis,  J.  H.,  &  Schoorman,  F.  D.  (1995).  An  integrative model  of  organizational  trust.  Academy of  management  review,  20(3), 709-734.
Miller,  S.  J.  (2012),  The  relationship  between  junior  high  school  teachers, perceptions  of  a  healthy  school  environment  and  their  trust  in  the  principle, colleagues  and the school  organization.
Miriam,  M.,  &  Martin,  H.  (2013).  Shared  leadership  effectiveness  in independent  professional  teams.  European  Management  Journal,  31(4),  423–432.
Mohammadi,  M.,  &  Jafari,  S.  (2015).  Presenting  a  structural  model  of study  skills,  self-efficacy  and  students'  evaluation  of  curriculum  quality  (Case study:  Shiraz  University).  Journal  of  Education  and  Learning  Research,  22  (7), 64-49.  [in Persian].
Mukherjee,  K.,  &  Bhattacharya,  R.  (2013).  Exploring  the  Mediating Effect  of  Organizational  Trust  Between  Organizational  Justice  Dimensions  and Affective Commitment,  Management  and Labour Studies, 38(1 &  2),  63–79.
Muller,  Ralph  O.  (2011).  Basic  Foundations  of  Structural  Equation Modeling  Introduction  of  LISREL  and  EQS  Software,  Translated  by  Siavash Talepsand, Semnan:  Semnan University.
Nelson, K. M., & Cooprider, J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS quarterly, 409-432.
Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (2004), Supervision for today's schools. Josei-Bass, an Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Cross point Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256.
Palanisamy, R. (2008). Organizational culture and knowledge management in ERP implementation: an empirical study. Journal of Computer Information System, 48(2), 100-120.
Peterson, N. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the individual: Toward an ontological network of organizational empowerment. American journal of community psychology, 34(1-2), 129-145.
Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and sociability in online communities: A comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(10), 721.
Puusa, A., & Tolvanen, U. (2006). Organizational identity and trust. EJBO-Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 11(2), 29-33.
Renzl, B. (2008). Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2), 206-220.
Safari. A., Abdollahi, B., & Sabouri, F. (2019). The impact of collaboration between school teachers on process quality improvement   Teaching 2_ Learning. Journal of School Administration, 7(3), 193-179.
Sevi, E. (2010). Effects of organizational citizenship behavior on group performance: Results from an agent-based simulation model. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(1), 25-37.
Sobhaninia, M. H. (2003). A study of the performance of theoretical high school departments in Isfahan province in the last 3 years, Isfahan. Research, Education Organization. [in Persian].
Srivastava, A., & Bartol, K. M. (2006). Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-51.
Taghvaee Yazdi, M. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Health Components and Organizational Trust and Social Responsibility of Sari Education Teachers. Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, (2, 3) 7, 116-95. [in Persian].
Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241.
Tlaiss, H. A., & Elamin, A. M. (2015). Exploring organizational trust and organizational justice among junior and middle managers in Saudi Arabia: trust in immediate supervisor as a mediator. Journal of Management Development, 34(9), 1042-1060.
Tohidi,  H.  (2011).  Teamwork  productivity  &  effectiveness  in  an organization  base  on  rewards,  leadership,  training,  goals,  wage,  size,  motivation, and  measurement  and  information  technology.  Procedia  Computer  Science,  3, 1137-1146.
Utami,  A.,  Bangun,  Y.,  &  Lantu,  D.  (2014).  Understanding  the  Role  of EmotionalIntelligence  and  Trust  to  the  Relationship  between  Organizational Politics  and  Organizational  Commitment,  Procedia  -  Social  and  Behavioral Sciences  115, 378  –  386.
Wang,  Zh.,  &  Wang,  N.  (2012).  Knowledge  Sharing,  Innovation  and  Firm Performance.  Expert  Systems with  Applications, 39, 8899–8908.
Wu,  V.,  &  Short,  P.  M.  (1996).  The  relationship  of  the  empowerment  to teachers’  job  commitment  and  job  satisfaction.  Journal  of  Instructional Psychology, 23, 85-89.
Xue,  Y.,  Bradley,  J.,  &  Liang,  H.  (2011).  Team  climate,  empowering leadership,  and  knowledge  sharing.  Journal  of  knowledge  management,  15(2), 299-312.
Yukl,  G.  (2009).  Leading  organizational  learning:  Reflections  on  theory and research.  The Leadership Quarterly,  20, 49-53.
Yunus,  N.,  Yunus,  J.,  &  Ishak,  S.  (2012).  The  school  principal's  role  in teaching  supervision  in  selected  schools  in  Perak,  Malaysia.  Asian  Journal  of Business  and Management  Sciences, 1(2), 50-55.
Zheng,  W.,  Yang,  B.,  &  McLean,  G.  N.  (2010).  Linking  organizational culture,  structure,  strategy,  and  organizational  effectiveness:  Mediating  role  of knowledge management.  Journal  of  Business research, 63(7), 763-771.
Zwain,  A.  A.  A.,  Teong,  L.  K.,  &  Othman,  S.  N.  (2012).  Knowledge management  processes  and  academic  performance  in  Iraqi  HEIs:  An  empirical investigation.  International  Journal  of  Academic  Research  in  Business  and  Social Sciences, 2(6), 273.
School Administration
Volume 8, Issue 2
May 2020
Pages 22-1

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 February 2019
  • Revise Date: 20 January 2020
  • Accept Date: 21 January 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics