A Study and Comparison of the Personal Constructs of Management Among Novice and Veteran School Principals

Document Type : Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Science, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 MA of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Science, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

3 PhD Student of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Science, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

Achieving the goals of educational systems and responding correctly to the expectations of students, parents and teachers depend on the existence of efficient and effective educational administrators and their beliefs. Therefore, the attention of education researchers is focused on the understanding of management in educational settings. Since individuals' beliefs cause the creation of personality structures, so the study of managers' personality structures can be helpful in selecting, transferring and relocating educational managers on a scientific basis, recognizing the necessary components of management to establish training courses, predicting future actions of managers and reducing skepticism and uncertainty and identifying the stylistic complexity of managers. On the other hand, structures enable educational administrators to better fulfill their professional mission. Based on the importance of this issue, the main purpose of the study was to identify and compare the personal structures of management among school principals. In the present study, in order to achieve the personal construct of managers, an interpretive approach and a qualitative method of case study were used. Participants included all public school principals in Sanandaj who were employed in 2021 and had more than one year of managerial experience. Therefore, sampling was done in a target based using the criterion method. Also, the number of samples was appropriate for the Repertory Grid Technique which is usually used for the sample with small number, 43 novice and experienced Principal were chosen. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and a Repertory Grid Matrix. Finally, 575 personal construct were extracted during 43 interviews. Content analysis with the unit of subject was applied for the data analysis. The collected data of the personal construct of administrator were classified in 4 main categories and 13 sub-categories, which included issues as morality, relationship, personal features and intellectual-functional. The results of this study indicates that the highest percentage of personal constructs of novice and experienced managers is in the category of communication and the lowest percentage of personal structures for novice managers is in the category of intellectual-operational and also for experienced managers is in the category of ethics.

Keywords


Adams-Webber, J. R. (2001). Cognitive complexity and role relationships. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14 (1), 43-50.
Applebee, A. N. (1976). Developmental of children’s to repertory grids, British Journal social and clinical Psychology, 15, 101-102
Bannister, D., & Mair, J. M. (1968). The Evaluation of Personal Constructs, Academic Press, London.
Bourne, H., & Jenkins, M. (2005). Eliciting managers’ personal values: an adaptation of the laddering interview method. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 410-428.
Brown, C. A., & Detoy, C. J. (1988). A comparison of the personal constructs of management in new and veteran managers, American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76. 
Crackett, W. H. (1982). The organization of construct systems: The organization corollary, In J. C. Mancuso & J.R. Adams-Webber (Eds). Theconstruing person. New York: Pager.
Dackert, I., Jackson, P. R., Brenner, S., & Johansson, C. R. (2003). Electing and analyzing employee’s expectations of a manger. Human Relations. 56, 705-725.
Dainty, P. (1991). Meaningful management research using repertory grid: Problem and possibilities, in Smith, N., Dainty, P. (Eds), The Management Research Handbook, Rutledge, London.
 Danaeefard, H., & Mortazavi, L. (2011). Understanding the way of sense making in organization: an analysis on philosophical foundation and conducting procedure of repertory gird methodology. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities Journal, 27, 51-66. [In Persian].
Daniels, K., Chernatony, L. D.,  & Johnson, G. (1995).Validating a method for mapping managers mental models of competitive industry structure. Human Relations, 48, 975- 991.
Duck, S. W. (1973). Similarity and perceived similarity of personal construct as influences on friendship choice. British Journal Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 1-6.
Fairley, E. F. (2002).The effects of professional development on ministerial leaders thing and practice. (Unpublished PhD thesis). Faculty of Education, Griffith University.
Farrell, P. A. T. (2010). A conceptualization of the work of veteran teaching-principals. Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 7, 16-26
Fassin, Y., Rossem, A.V., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers perceptions of business ethics. Business Ethics, 98, 425-453.
Feixas, G., Geldschläger, H. Y., & Niemeyer, R. A. (2002). Content analysis of personal constructs. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 1-19.
Flick, U. (2006).  An introduction to Qualitative Research (3th ed). Sage Publication.
Fransella, F., & Banister, D. (1967). A validation of repertory grid technique as a measure of political construing, Acta psychological, 26, 97-106.
Fransella, F., & Thomas, L. (1998). Experimenting with personal construct psychology. London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2th ed). John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2002). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed). White Plains, New York: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Illia, L. (2009). Exploring how to diagnose members concerns about changes in core elements of organizations. Applied Behavioral Science. 45, 550-580.
Jankowicz, D. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley
Jenkins, H. O. (1985). Job perceptions of senior managers in schools and manufacturing industry. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 13, 1-11.
Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. V. 1 & 2, Norton, New NY.
König, C. J., Jori, E., & Knusel, P. (2011).The amazing diversity of thought: qualitative study on how human resource practitioners perceive selection procedures. Journal of Business & Psychology, 26(4), 437-450.
Landfield, A. W. (1971). Personal construct systems in psychotherapy. Chicago: Rand McNally
Moffat, K. P. (1982). Decision making in the secondary school: a case study of the constructs of the teacher using the repertory grid. University of Wollongong- Department of Education.
 Moosavi Bzargani, S. J. (2005). Growth Center or Technology Park? Public or private? Technology growth, 3(9), 30-33. [In Persian]
Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking a study of teaching at work. (1st ed). Routledge, London.
Peters, W. L. (1994). Repertory grid as a tool for training needs analysis. The Learning Organization, 1 (2), 23-28.
Peterson, S. E. (2005). A repertory Grid evaluation for a multidimensional theory of Courage. The University of Kansas, Available, at: www.proquest.com
Polit, Denise F., Beck, Cheryl Tatano, & Hungler, Bernadette P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal, and utilization. Study guide (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Roche, V. (1999). Self- managed organizational transformation: a case study of roles in higher education, unpublished PhD Thesis. Southern Cross University, Lismore.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. (2011). Theories of Personality. (translation by Seyed-Mohamma, Y.), Tehran.  Virayesh Publication Institute. [In Persian]
Sechrest, L., & Jacchson, D. N. (1961). Social intelligence and accuracy of interpersonal predictions. Journal of Personality, 29, 169-182
Thomas, L., & Harri- Augstein, S. (1985). Self organized learning: foundations of a conversational science for psychology, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wright, R. (2008). Eliciting Cognitions of Strategizing Using Advanced Repertory Grids in a World Constructed and Reconstructed. Organizational Research Methods, 11 (4), 753-769.
Younesi, S. J. (2000). A simple technique in measuring of mental concepts among mental retarded children. Journal of New Psychotherapy, 19(20), 25-34. [In Persian]
 Zuber-Skerritt, O. Z. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflections, Kogan PAGE, London.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. Z., & Roache, V. (2004). A constructivist model for evaluating postgraduate supervision: A case study. Quality Assurance in Education, 12, 82-93.