Author Guidelines: Journal of School Administration
Last Updated: June 2026
Table of Contents
1.1 Broad Definition
The Journal of School Administration is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to advancing the theory, research, and practice of educational leadership and school management. We publish original empirical research, theoretical contributions, systematic reviews, and methodological papers that examine how schools are organized, led, and improved.
Primary audience: Academics, researchers, graduate students, school administrators (principals, vice principals, department heads), district leaders, education policymakers, and teacher leaders.
Educational levels covered: Pre-K–12 and K–12 education (early childhood through secondary education).
1.2 Core Topic Areas (Organized by Theme)
We welcome submissions on the following topics:
1.3 Methodological Scope
We welcome diverse research approaches:
|
Methodology |
Examples |
|
Quantitative |
Surveys, experiments, quasi-experiments, longitudinal studies, secondary analysis of large datasets (e.g., national education datasets), meta-analyses, structural equation modeling |
|
Qualitative |
Case studies, ethnography, interviews, focus groups, document analysis, classroom/school observations, phenomenological studies |
|
Mixed Methods |
Sequential or concurrent designs combining quantitative survey data with qualitative interview data |
|
Theoretical/Conceptual |
New theoretical frameworks, model development, systematic literature reviews, policy analysis |
|
Systematic Reviews |
PRISMA-compliant systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-syntheses, meta-analyses |
|
Methodological |
New instruments, validated surveys, measurement tools, or analytical approaches for school administration research |
|
Action Research |
Practitioner-led research in schools with clear methodology and reflection |
1.4 Types of Articles Accepted
|
Article Type |
Description |
Typical Word Count |
|
Original Research |
Full-length empirical studies |
Up to 7,000 words |
|
Review Articles |
Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, critical literature reviews |
Up to 8,000 words |
|
Theoretical Articles |
New frameworks, models, or conceptual advances |
Up to 6,000 words |
|
Case Studies |
In-depth analysis of a single school, district, or program |
Up to 5,000 words |
|
Methodological Articles |
New instruments or analytical techniques |
Up to 5,000 words |
|
Policy Analysis |
Critical examination of education policies affecting schools |
Up to 5,000 words |
|
Book Reviews |
Reviews of recent scholarly books (by invitation or open submission) |
1,500–2,000 words |
|
Practitioner Briefs |
Research summaries translated for school leaders |
2,000–3,000 words |
The Journal of School Administration follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. All authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to adhere to COPE principles.
|
Item |
Information |
|
Journal Email |
|
|
Submission System URL |
|
|
Journal ISSN |
|
|
Publisher |
University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran |
|
Publication Frequency |
Quarterly |
|
DOI Prefix |
Important: All inquiries, requests, and correspondence regarding submissions must be sent to the journal email address. Authors are strongly recommended to direct all communication through the official journal email rather than contacting individual editors or staff members personally. This ensures your request is properly documented and responded to in a timely manner. Expected response time: 1 week.
After registering on the journal submission system and carefully reading these guidelines, authors must prepare and submit the following 5 files:
|
File |
Description |
File Naming Convention |
|
a. Authors' Information File |
Contains full name, academic rank, department, faculty, university, city, country, organizational email, phone number, and ORCID for each author. Do not use titles like Dr. or Professor. |
Authors_Lastname.docx |
|
b. Main Manuscript File |
Complete manuscript (title, abstract, keywords, main text, references, acknowledgements). No author identifiers in this file for blind review. |
Manuscript_Lastname.docx |
|
c. Conflict of Interest Form |
Completed, signed (or stamped) by all authors. Download from journal website. |
COI_Lastname.pdf |
|
d. Declaration of Commitment Form |
Completed, signed (or stamped) by all authors. Download from journal website. |
Declaration_Lastname.pdf |
|
e. Similarity Check Report |
Generated by approved plagiarism detection software (e.g., Samim Noor, iThenticate). Report must be no more than 3 months old. |
Similarity_Lastname.pdf |
Important: If any file is missing or incorrectly formatted, your submission will be returned to you without review.
Example: Associate Professor, Department of Educational Leadership, Faculty of Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, a.rahimi@ut.ac.ir
Tip for novice authors: Setting up an ORCID takes 2 minutes. It ensures you get credit for your work and is now required by most reputable journals.
6.1 Required Structure (in order)
Your main manuscript file must follow this exact order:
|
Section |
Required? |
Notes |
|
1. Title |
✅ Yes |
Concise, descriptive, maximum 20 words |
|
2. Abstract |
✅ Yes |
150–250 words (see Section 7.2) |
|
3. Keywords |
✅ Yes |
3–5 words or short phrases |
|
4. Introduction |
✅ Yes |
Background, problem statement, research questions |
|
5. Statement of the Problem |
✅ Yes |
Clear articulation of the gap or issue addressed |
|
6. Theoretical Literature / Literature Review |
✅ Yes |
Review of relevant theories and prior research |
|
7. Research Methodology |
✅ Yes |
Design, sample, instruments, procedures, analysis |
|
8. Data Analysis / Findings |
✅ Yes |
Results with tables/figures as needed |
|
9. Discussion |
✅ Yes |
Interpretation of findings in context of prior research |
|
10. Conclusion |
✅ Yes |
Summary, limitations, implications |
|
11. Recommendations |
✅ Yes |
For practice and future research |
|
12. Acknowledgements |
Optional |
Funding sources, AI disclosure, thanks to colleagues |
|
13. References |
✅ Yes |
Complete list in required citation style |
|
14. Appendices |
Optional |
Surveys, interview protocols, supplementary data |
6.2 Abstract Structure
Your abstract (150–250 words) must include:
Example abstract (good):
*This study examined the relationship between principal instructional leadership and student reading achievement in 120 urban elementary schools. Using a cross-sectional survey design, we collected data from 120 principals and 3,400 teachers, analyzing responses using hierarchical linear modeling. Findings indicated that principal instructional leadership explained 18% of between-school variance in reading achievement after controlling for school demographic characteristics. Distributed leadership practices—particularly shared goal-setting and collaborative professional development—were the strongest predictors. We conclude that principals seeking to raise reading achievement should prioritize building teacher leadership capacity rather than engaging in direct instructional supervision alone. Recommendations for principal preparation programs and district policies are discussed.*
6.3 Formatting Specifications
|
Element |
Requirement |
|
Maximum pages |
20 pages (including references and tables) |
|
Maximum word count |
6,500 words (excluding abstract, references, tables) |
|
Abstract |
150–250 words |
|
Keywords |
3–5 words |
|
Language |
English (American or British, but consistent) |
|
Font |
Times New Roman, size 12 |
|
Line spacing |
Double (2.0) |
|
Margins |
1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides |
|
Page numbers |
Centered at bottom of each page |
|
File format |
Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) only (no PDF for main manuscript) |
|
Tables and figures |
Embedded in the text, numbered sequentially (Table 1, Table 2; Figure 1, Figure 2) |
|
Table/figure resolution |
Minimum 300 dpi for images |
6.4 Additional Formatting Notes for Novice Authors
Recommended reference manager: Zotero (free), EndNote, or Mendeley. These tools will format your references automatically.
Example reference list (APA 7th):
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
If your research received financial support, include an Acknowledgements section before the references:
Example:
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the [Name of Funding Body], Grant Number [XXXXXX]. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank Dr. Jane Smith for feedback on an earlier draft and the participating school districts for their cooperation.
Also acknowledge:
9.1 Human Subjects Research
If your study involves human participants (students, teachers, principals, parents, etc.), you must include an ethics statement in your manuscript (in the Methodology section) confirming:
Example ethics statement:
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of [University Name] (Protocol #2024-001). All participants provided written informed consent. For student participants under 18, parental consent was obtained along with student assent. Data were anonymized before analysis.*
AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini, Grammarly) may be used only for:
AI tools may not be used for:
Disclosure requirement: If you used any AI tool, you must disclose this in the Acknowledgements section, specifying:
Example disclosure:
The authors used ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, 2025) solely for grammar and spelling checking during manuscript preparation. No AI tools were used for data analysis, interpretation, or content generation. The authors assume full responsibility for the final manuscript.
Prohibited: AI tools cannot be listed as co-authors. Only humans can be authors.
Every manuscript must include a Data Availability Statement after the main text and before the references. Choose one of the following templates:
|
Statement |
When to Use |
|
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. |
Most common; data not publicly deposited |
|
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name] at [DOI/URL]. |
When data are publicly archived |
|
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed. |
For conceptual, theoretical, or review articles |
|
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. |
Alternative to first option |
Example:
Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Ethical restrictions prevent public deposition of data containing student-level identifiers.
The journal uses a double-blind peer review model. This means:
12.1 How to Prepare for Double-Blind Review
|
Do This |
Do NOT Do This |
|
Remove all author names and affiliations from the main manuscript file |
List authors in the main file (put them in the separate Authors' Information File) |
|
Remove acknowledgements that identify you (e.g., "We thank our colleagues at University X") |
Include acknowledgements in the main file (move them to the Authors' Information File, to be added after acceptance) |
|
Replace self-citations that reveal identity: change "as we previously found (Smith, 2020)" to "as previously found (Smith, 2020)" |
Leave self-citations in the first person |
|
Remove any reference to your institution, department, or funding source from the main text |
Include these in the main file |
12.2 Review Process Details
|
Element |
Detail |
|
Number of reviewers |
Minimum 2, typically 2–3 |
|
Reviewer selection |
Based on expertise; authors may request exclusion of up to 3 reviewers (provide names and reasons) |
|
Review timeline |
Reviewers are asked to complete reviews within 4 weeks |
|
Revision timeline |
Authors typically receive 4–6 weeks to complete revisions |
|
Revision extension |
Requests for extensions (up to 2 additional weeks) may be granted if submitted in writing before the deadline |
|
Missed revision deadline |
Without an approved extension, the manuscript may be withdrawn or treated as a new submission |
13.1 Article Processing Charges (APCs)
|
Fee Type |
Amount |
|
Submission fee |
5000000Rials/ 10 $ |
|
Publication fee |
50000000 Rials/50$ |
13.2 Open Access Policy
The journal is [select one: fully open access / subscription-based / hybrid].
13.3 Licensing
Articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (or as otherwise specified). This allows anyone to share and adapt the work with proper attribution.
13.4 Copyright Transfer
Upon acceptance, the corresponding author will receive a Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA) or Publishing License. Authors retain the right to:
|
Stage |
Fee |
Conditions |
|
Before peer review begins |
5000000Rials/50 $ |
Corresponding author must email withdrawal request with all co-authors copied |
|
After peer review has commenced |
5000000Rials/100 $ |
Administrative fee may apply |
|
After acceptance |
Not permitted |
Manuscript cannot be withdrawn once accepted |
How to withdraw: Send email to journal email address with subject line "WITHDRAWAL REQUEST: [Manuscript ID]" signed by all co-authors.
If your manuscript is rejected, you may appeal the decision within 30 days of the rejection date.
To file an appeal: Send an email to the journal email address with subject line "APPEAL: [Manuscript ID]" containing:
What happens next: The Editor-in-Chief or a designated editorial board member will review the appeal. The decision after appeal is final. No second appeals are permitted.
A rejected manuscript may be resubmitted only if:
Without an invitation to resubmit, a rejected manuscript will be desk-rejected if resubmitted.
The Journal of School Administration is indexed or abstracted in the following databases:
Note: Indexing status changes over time. Please check the journal website for the most current information.
17.1 Digital Preservation
The journal's content is digitally preserved in:
If the journal ceases publication, archived content will remain accessible through these preservation services.
Follow these steps carefully:
Step 1: Prepare Your Materials
Step 2: Register or Log In
Step 3: Start a New Submission
|
Step |
Action |
|
1. Start |
Select article type, confirm adherence to guidelines |
|
2. Upload Files |
Upload all 5 files (authors info, main manuscript, COI form, declaration form, similarity report) |
|
3. Enter Metadata |
Enter title, abstract, keywords, authors (in correct order), affiliations, ORCIDs |
|
4. Additional Information |
Answer ethics questions (human subjects? conflicts of interest? funding?) |
|
5. Comments |
Add a cover letter to the editor (optional but recommended) |
|
6. Review |
Check all information for accuracy |
|
7. Submit |
Click "Submit" – you will receive a confirmation email |
Step 4: After Submission
Tip: Save your manuscript ID (e.g., JSA-2026-00123). You will need it for all future correspondence.
19.1 Typical Timeline
|
Stage |
Estimated Time |
What Happens |
|
Initial check (desk review) |
5–10 business days |
Editor checks scope, formatting, plagiarism, completeness |
|
Reviewer assignment |
1–2 weeks |
Editor invites 2–3 reviewers |
|
Peer review |
4–6 weeks |
Reviewers evaluate manuscript |
|
Editorial decision |
1–2 weeks |
Editor synthesizes reviews and makes decision |
|
First decision (typical) |
8–12 weeks from submission |
You receive decision letter |
|
Revision (if invited) |
4–6 weeks (authors) |
You revise and resubmit |
|
Second review |
2–4 weeks |
Reviewers check revisions |
|
Final decision |
1–2 weeks |
Accept or reject |
|
Production |
4–8 weeks |
Copyediting, typesetting, proof review, publication |
|
Total to publication |
4–6 months |
19.2 Possible Editorial Decisions
|
Decision |
Meaning |
Next Steps |
|
Desk reject |
Manuscript does not meet scope or quality standards |
You may submit elsewhere |
|
Major revisions |
Substantial changes required; manuscript may be sent for second review |
Revise and resubmit within 6 weeks |
|
Minor revisions |
Small changes required (e.g., clarify a method, add a citation) |
Revise and resubmit within 4 weeks |
|
Accept with minor revisions |
Manuscript will be accepted after small changes |
Revise and resubmit within 2 weeks |
|
Accept |
Manuscript approved for publication |
Move to production |
19.3 Tracking Your Manuscript
Please do not email the journal to ask for status updates within 4 weeks of submission. The system automatically updates. This is what we mean by "unnecessary contact."
To save you time, avoid these common mistakes:
|
Reason |
How to Avoid |
|
Manuscript outside scope |
Read Section 1 carefully; send a pre-submission inquiry if unsure |
|
Missing files |
Use the checklist in Section 26 |
|
Similarity too high (>15%) |
Paraphrase, use quotations sparingly, cite all sources |
|
No ORCID for any author |
Register for free at orcid.org |
|
Faculty author used Gmail/Yahoo |
Use institutional email |
|
Author names in main manuscript |
Remove all identifiers for blind review |
|
Structure does not follow required order |
Follow Section 7.1 exactly |
|
Abstract too short or too long |
Keep between 150–250 words |
|
Exceeds page/word limit |
Edit to meet limits (20 pages, 6,500 words) |
|
No ethics statement for human subjects |
Add statement to Methodology section |
|
Missing data availability statement |
Add before references |
|
AI use not disclosed |
Disclose in Acknowledgements |
|
Incomplete or unsigned forms |
All authors must sign |
|
Similarity report older than 3 months |
Generate a new report |
If English is not your first language, we strongly recommend professional editing before submission to improve clarity and readability.
The journal does not endorse specific services. Note: Use of a language editing service does not guarantee acceptance. It only improves presentation.
Use this checklist before submitting. Check every box.
Scope and Fit
Ethics and Policies
Formatting (Main Manuscript)
Files Ready to Upload
Final Check
|
Purpose |
Contact Method |
|
Pre-submission inquiries |
jsa@uok.ac.ir (subject: "Pre-submission inquiry") |
|
Submission system technical issues |
Use "Contact Us" link in the submission system |
|
Appeals and withdrawal requests |
jsa@uok.ac.ir (subject: "APPEAL" or "WITHDRAWAL REQUEST") |
|
General questions |
Journal Email: jsa@uok.ac.ir
Submission System: https://jsa.uok.ac.ir/
Journal Website: https://jsa.uok.ac.ir/
Response time: 10 business days for email inquiries.
Reminder: After submission, track your manuscript only through the online system. Do not email the journal for status updates within 4 weeks of submission. This is considered unnecessary contact and slows down processing for everyone.
These guidelines are subject to change. Authors must always refer to the latest version on the journal website before submitting. The journal website always contains the most current guidelines.
Thank you for considering the Journal of School Administration for your research. We look forward to your submission.