A Thematic Analysis of School Principals’ at Different Educational Levels Lived Experience of the Impact of Student Behavior on Their Personality Orientation: A Qualitative Study

Document Type : Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Lorestan, Khorramabad, Iran.

2 PhD student in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.

10.22034/jsa.2025.144464.2608

Abstract

The present study aimed to conduct a thematic analysis of the lived experiences of school principals at various educational levels regarding the impact of student behavior on their personality orientation. This research employed a qualitative approach with an interpretive phenomenological strategy. A purposeful and criterion-based sampling method was used to select individuals with the most relevant information and experiences related to the research topic, and the criterion for continuing the research was based on theoretical saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and a total of 14 school principals from different educational levels in Susangerd were interviewed. The data were analyzed using a three-stage thematic content analysis method (open, axial, selective coding). The findings indicate that principals' interactions with students at different educational levels have varying impacts on their personal and professional orientation. Seven final categories (main categories) were extracted from the data analysis, which include: 1) Impact of Students' Age Maturity, 2) The Difference in Relationships in Academic Levels, 3) The Impact on Personality Dimensions, 4) Principals' Personal and Professional Development, 5) Job Satisfaction of Managers, 6) The Role of Internal and External Factors, and 7) Creativity of Elementary Managers. The research results demonstrate that principals' lived experiences of interacting with students influence their personality orientation. These effects vary across different educational levels (elementary, junior high, senior high) due to the developmental characteristics of students and the specific challenges of each level. This study can contribute to designing empowerment programs for principals, taking into account level-specific needs.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Applied Psychological Research Quarterly. (2015). Attachment to teacher and academic engagement in male and female students. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 6(2), 119–132. [In Persian]
Bahadori, M., Koushkaki, A., Asadollahi, S., & Moradipour, M. )2024(. The Role of School Principals in Creating a Motivational Environment for Teachers and Students, The 7th International Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Social Studies, Hamadan. [In Persian]
Bing, H. (2022). The effect of teacher self-efficacy and emotion regulation on burnout among EFL teachers: Evidence from the Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 916098.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brophy, J. (2014). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Brown, T., Johnson, L., & Williams, R. (2022). Teacher-student interactions across educational levels: A comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 475-490.
Byrne, B., & Miller, A. (1999). Professional identity, school reform, and burnout. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A source book of international research and practice (pp. 227–255). Cambridge University Press.
Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). Patience and perseverance in teaching: How teacher experience influences classroom management strategies in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(1), 45-62.
Chen, Q., Li, M., & Sun, R. (2021). Teacher–student relationships across school levels: Developmental perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 254–268.
Cruickshank, V. (2017). The Influence of School Leadership on Student Outcomes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9): 115-123
Davis, A., Lee, S., & Taylor, K. (2021). Professional growth of teachers through student interactions. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 57(4), 632-648.
Fathi, J., & Saeidian, A. (2020). Investigating the structural model of self-efficacy, resilience, and burnout among Iranian EFL teachers. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 14–28. [In Persian]
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school leadership and management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Johnson, L., & Smith, R. (2020). Emotional challenges in teacher-student relationships: A longitudinal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93(1), 102-112.
Kim, H., Park, S., & Lee, J. (2023). Empathy in teaching: The influence of teacher-student relationships on teachers’ emotional intelligence and classroom management skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103-114.
Lari, N., Hejazi-Moghari, E., Jokar, B., & Eje’i, J. (2022). The quality of teacher–student relationship in the school context: An ethnographic study. Educational Psychology, 18(64), 129–156. [In Persian]
Lee, J., Park, H., & Kim, Y. (2023). Student influence on job satisfaction among teachers in different educational levels. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101734.
Lee, S., Kim, H., & Choi, J. (2021). The effects of teacher-student interaction on teachers' communication skills and job satisfaction in elementary education settings. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 237-254.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.
Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Teacher-student relationships and academic motivation in elementary school students: A longitudinal study. Educational Psychology, 40(5), 561-576.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Li, X. (2022). Positive teacher–student relationships may lead to better student motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1259–1272.
Marschall, G. (2022). The role of teacher identity in teacher self-efficacy development: The case of Katie. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(5), 725–747.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.
Mohammadi-Nejad, A., & Nikbakht, O. (2023). The effect of teacher–student relationship quality and educational environment quality on academic enthusiasm of primary school students in Tehran. Research and Innovation in Education and Development, 3(4), 20–30. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2019). Qualitative research method: Anti-method – Philosophical foundations and practical procedures in qualitative methodology (M. Hoomandi, Ed.). Tehran: Logos. [In Persian]
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
Pianta, R. C. (2012). The ecology of human development: Classroom contexts for young children's learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Roehrig, G. D., & Gold, Y. (2016). Teacher–student relationships and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 86(1), 1-51.
Rostami Tanha, M., Mousavi, M., Vesalnia, M., Jalil-Tahmasebi, N., & Mousavi, S. (2023). Investigating factors affecting job burnout and self-efficacy in teachers. Journal of Psychological and Educational Studies, 5(47). [In Persian]
Sabzianpour, Z., &  Eslam Panah, M. (2019). Returning to Management: Designing and Explaining a New Model of Educational Managers' Competencies Using Thematic Analysis, School Management Quarterly, 7(1): 1-23. [In Persian]
Sanati, Z., & Adli, F. (2024). Analyzing the Role of School Administrators in the Performance of the Educational System from the Perspective of Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management. 4(17): 259-288. [In Persian]
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Relations with Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625.
Smith, J., Brown, R., & Johnson, K. (2020). Teacher–student relationships and professional identity development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103–147.
Smith, J., Brown, T., & Wilson, D. (2021). The role of maturity in teacher-student relationships. Child Development Perspectives, 15(2), 123-130.
Smith, J., & Williams, R. (2023). Creativity in primary school teaching: Comparative studies with secondary education. Journal of Creative Education, 29(4), 289-302.
Smith, R., & Johnson, L. (2022). Flexibility in teaching: How adapting to student needs enhances teacher resilience and effectiveness in secondary education. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(3), 245-258.
Thompson, R. & Miller, D. (2023). "Navigating teacher-student relationships during early adolescence." Journal of Early Adolescence, 43(2), 231-255.
Veldman, I., van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2013). Job satisfaction and teacher–student relationships across the teaching career: Four case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 55–65.
Wartenberg, G. (2023). Satisfied and high performing? A meta-analysis of teacher job satisfaction and its correlates. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1381–1402. 
Williams, R., Davis, A., & Johnson, L. (2022). External and internal factors in shaping teacher-student dynamics. Educational Review, 74(6), 875-890.
Wilson, A., Chen, Y., & Davis, M. (2020). Teacher-student relationship quality as a predictor of teachers’ emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 721-740.
Wilson, T., Kimura, K., & Adams, R.(2023). Positive teacher-student relationships as a pathway to professional growth for educators.Teaching and Teacher Education, 118.