Elucidating the Role Conflicts of School Principals in a Field of Multiple Forces: A Qualitative Study on the Simultaneous Management of Festivals, University Entrance Exams, and Pedagogical Objectives

Document Type : Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of psychology ,Department of Psychology,University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran.

2 , Department Of Psychology, Faculty Of Education And Psychology, University Of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

3 Department Of Psychology, Faculty Of Education And Psychology, University Of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

10.22034/jsa.2026.145358.2641

Abstract

Objectives: This research aimed to elucidate the lived experiences of school principals regarding role conflicts arising from the simultaneous management of three opposing forces—festivals, university entrance exams (Konkour), and pedagogical objectives—and to identify their strategies for navigating this field of forces.

Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a descriptive phenomenological approach. Participants included 17 senior high school principals from Markazi Province, selected through purposeful sampling with maximum variation. Data were collected via in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Colaizzi method.

Findings: Data analysis led to the extraction of five main themes: Educational Schizophrenia (feelings of role duality), Konkour as the Dominant Field Monster, Festivals as a Carnival of Showcasing Success, Strategies for Survival (including integration, negotiation, and creating hidden priorities), and Burnout and Hope. Framed within Bourdieu's field theory, the findings revealed that the "symbolic capital" derived from Konkour and festivals has dominated authentic educational "cultural capital."

Conclusion: Principals are caught in a field of opposing forces that challenge their professional identity. However, they act as "intelligent agents" who engage in resistance through creative strategies. Without structural reforms in the evaluation system and a reduction in the hegemony of the Konkour discourse, these conflicts will persist.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aksoy, E. (2023). Teaching or testing, which matters more? The transition among education levels in Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(2), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2023.10.2.376
Ahmadi, F., Abdollahi, H., Khorsandi Tasekuh, A., & Taheri, M. (2025). Analyzing the necessary grounds for transitioning from educational management to educational leadership in schools. Educational Leadership Research, 9(34), 83–118. https://doi.org/10.22054/jrlat.2024.80510.1763
Balali, E., Bakhtiari Safar, Z., Mohammadi, A., & Mohagheghi, H. (2016). Factors affecting women's role conflict and its relationship with family conflicts in Hamadan City. Applied Sociology, 27(4), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2017.21165
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2002). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press.
Erdağ, C., & Yenipınar, Ş. (2022). Exploring the accountability relationships of Turkish school principals: A qualitative study. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 19(49), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1156443
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19 – School leadership in crisis. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 321–326.
Huang, L., Zhao, D., & Zhou, S. (2024). Examining principal instructional leadership effects on the rural–urban instructional quality gap in China: The mechanism of teacher professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 81, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101346
Karami, A., Mehram, B., Shabani Varaki, B., & Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2012). The game of wisdom: The grounded theory of hidden curriculum in Iran's higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 7, 109–134.
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2013). Hidden curriculum and its map in higher education. Journal of Educational Studies, 2(5), 5–10.
Mincu, M. (2022). Why is school leadership key to transforming education? Structural and cultural assumptions for quality education in diverse contexts. Prospects, 52(3–4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09625-6
Nourizadeh, A., & Nazari, B. (2014). Investigating the hidden functions of diversity and variety in schools. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Issues, 2(35), 53–70.
Rutgers, M. R. (1999). Be rational! But what does it mean? A history of the idea of rationality and its relation to management thought. Journal of Management History, 5(1), 17–35.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
Yadgarzadeh, G. R., Fatemi, A., & Aliasghar Soltani, S. (2021). Investigating the effects of the national university entrance exam on the curriculum from the perspective of upper secondary school teachers. Research in Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.22070/tlr.2022.15410.1187
Yasami, S., Khalvandi, F., & Zarei, M. (2022). Investigating the relationship between hidden curriculum with academic engagement and communication skills of students. Dynamics in Educational and Counseling Sciences, 8(16), 113–133. https://sid.ir/paper/1030099/fa
Zhang, W. (2026). Exploring whole-person education reform from principals' perspective on high-stakes testing. International Journal of Educational Reform, 35(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231187417