Rethinking Educational Administration Studies in the Past Two Decades: Lessons for the future

Document Type : Mixed Method Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.34785/J010.1398.511

Abstract

Every discipline is dynamic and alive to its scientific identity, and educational administration has had many successes and failures over a century, like other academic disciplines in its ups and downs.
A review of historical events in this field suggests that there has been a great deal of effort in the history of educational administration thought to escape intellectual disarray. However, the uncertainty of the field of educational administration is evident in the fluctuations of theories in this field and its combination with other fields of management, many of which may have been based on positivist assumptions. Accordingly, a dominant view, educational administration, has over a century of experience and rich theoretical and epistemological foundations. To what extent we have this knowledge store and what has been introduced into our country as educational administration science, to what extent has the necessary scientific justification, justification and proportionate to social and cultural contexts been achieved and to what extent has it been effective? And to be expected in the scientific and developmental currents, are challenging questions to consider. The historical overview of educational administration developments can be plotted in a variety of categories.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the trend of studies and researches in educational administration. Accordingly, important variables such as the extent and process of scientific production, the identification of authors, collaborative research, co-authoring, journals, universities, important and prominent keywords, in the field of Educational Administration , were measured using the Vosviewer software. the outline of this software, is the scientific communication network. This study examines various studies of Educational Administration over the last 20 years (2000–2019) indexed in the Scopus database. Following the assumptions of the bibliometric method, the present study was conducted in the first part of social network analysis and in the second part of the type of citation analysis using Vosviewer software. Accordingly, this study is one of the integrated studies.
As stated, In order to delineate the scientific web of Educational Administration, the data and information of articles published in the Scopus citation database during the years 2000 to 2019 (the last 20 years) were selected. Searching for the Scopus Database by Keyword educational administration, October 12, 2019. After a preliminary search and review of the articles, records specifically related to educational administration were broken down. After separating out-of-field articles, 1349 records were finally analyzed and analyzed. In other words, the sample size of the study consisted of 1349 articles indexed between 2000 and 2019 on educational administration in the Scopus database. One of the most popular social network analysis software called Vosviewer was used to analyze the data and recognize the relationships and interactions of different variables used in the research. For this purpose, the bibliometric information of 1349 records was extracted after extraction and analyzed by social network analysis on the tables and forms considered as software output. In the second part, the results of this analysis are described in full in the vertical citation analysis method.
In this study, first, to investigate the process of educational administration from 2000 to 2019, the researcher sought to examine the temporal trend of research conducted during the last 20 years. In other words, it became clear in this step how many articles have been published in this field over the past 20 years. In the following, the types of documents that put the concept of educational administration into consideration were given separately and the most cited publications in this field were introduced. The most important partner countries in producing articles related to the concept of educational administration were also identified. Finally, it has been delineated and analyzed into the scientific conceptualization of educational administration.
The findings of the study showed that according to the place of publication with the highest number of citations and most cited articles, the US ranked first in the world followed by China, Canada and Australia. According to the publication reference, the most cited journals belong to the American Journal of educational administration, the Journal of educational administration, and the Journal of Leadership Education Research, respectively. Among the keywords used in the research, the concept of educational administration mainly applies to the concepts of leadership, training and Administration . The analytical findings also showed that the concept of educational administration has a wide range of related concepts and its breadth and diversity can be contemplated. Such an extension can be attributed to the breadth of topics studied in the field and in some cases due to its lack of focus on its particular specialized concepts.
Regarding network analysis, which illustrates the subjective diversity of specialized knowledge of educational administration, it can be said that existing diversity can be an opportunity or threat for the development of any discipline. The opportunity to be considered as a subjective diversity of educational administration knowledge thus encompasses the three levels of macro (educational policy), intermediate (management of educational and non-educational organizations) and micro (school management), indicating the special importance and applicability of educational administration knowledge. On this basis, it can be said that the development of educational administration. knowledge can lead to dramatic changes in all Educational systems as well as society and industry, and this is a reciprocal achievement for the theoretical development of educational administration knowledge. On the other hand, the possible divergence of some scholars from the domain of specialized discipline and the move towards what may not be directly related to Educational Administration knowledge is a threat to the subjective diversity of studies in educational administration.
In addition to revealing the growth of this knowledge, the scientific network of educational administration can guide the direction of researchers in this field. A limitation of this study was the limitation of using Vosviewer software for internal databases. It is hoped that the findings of the present study and other related research in educational administration will be a way to overcome this specialized knowledge and help to solve the problems ahead.

Keywords


Ahanchian, M.R. (2020). Introduction to Educational Administration, Tehran, Ney Publishing.
Ahanchian, M.R. (2019). The End of Management., The Collapse of Management Narratives in Modern Times, Second Edition, Tehran, Ney Publishing.
Allio, R. (2005). Leadership development: Teaching versus learning, Journal of Management Decision, 7(8), 1071-1077.
Arefi, M. (2005). Evaluation of Educational Planning Curriculum (Educational Administration) in Iranian Higher Education from the Perspectives of  Students,  Specialists  and  Employers,  Journal  of  Curriculum  Studies,  year  1, No.  1.
Biglan,  A.  (1973).  The  characteristics  of  subject  matter  in  different  academic areas.  Journal  of  Applied  psychology,  57(3),  195.
Bush,  T.  (1999).  Crisis  or  Crossroad?  The  Discipline  of  Educational Management  in  the  Late  1990s.  Journal  of  Educational  Management  & Administration,  27(3),  239-252.
Chuang,  K.Y.,  Chuang,  Y.C.,  Ho,  M.,  &  Ho,  Y.S.  (2011).  Bibliometric analysis  of  public  health  research  in  Africa:  the  overall  trend  and  regional comparisons,  South  African  Journal  of  Science,  107(5-6),  54-59.  
Eisner,  E.  (1985).  The  Education  Imagination,  On  the  design  and  evaluation of  school.
Elliot,  C.,  &  Reynolds,  M.  (2001).  The  Critical  Movement  in  Management and  Manager-Educator  Relations.  CMS  Conference,  Education  Stream, Manchester.
English,  F.W.,  Papa,  R.,  Mullen,  C.A.,  &  Creighton,  T.  (2012).  Educational Leadership  at  2050;  Conjectures,  Challenges  and  Promises,  translation  by  Naser Shirbagi,  Ph.D  &  Roya  Fatehi,.  (2019).  Tehran,  Asar  Moaser  Publication.
Farzaneh,  M.,  Zeinabadi,  H.,  &  Darabi,  F.  (2018).  Analysis  of  the Competencies  of  Educational  Administration  Graduates  for  Working  In  The Training  sector  and  Development  of  Human  Resources  in  Indusrial organizations,  Journal  of  Educational  Measurement  and  Evaluation  Studies, 7(20),  73-102.
Glass,  E.,  Mason,  R.,  Eaton,  W.,  Parker,  J.C.,  &  Carver,  F.D.  (2004).  The History  of  Educational  Administration  viewed  Through  Its  Textbooks,  Naser Shirbagi,  Ph.D.  (1979).  Tehran:  Asar  Moaser  Publications.
Greendfield,  T.B.  (1986).  The  decline  and  fall  of  Science  in  Educational Administration,  Interchange,  17(2),  57-80.
Hallinger,  p.,  &  Chen,  J.  (2014).  Review  of  research  on  educational Leadership  and  management  in  Asia:  A  Comparative  analysis  of  research  topics and  methods,  1995-2012,  Educational  Management  Administration  & Leadership,43(1),  5-27.
Heck,  R.  H.,  &  Hallinger,  P.  (2005).  The  Study  of  Educational  Leadership and  Management  Where  Does  the  Field  Stand  Today?  Educational  Management Administration  &  Leadership,  33(2),  229-224.
Hosseingholizadeh,  R.,  Ahanchian,  M.R.,  Noferesti,  A.,  &  Kouhsari,  M. (2016).  A  History  of  Educational  Management  Thought  with  Regards  to International  Experiences,  Mashhad:  Journal  of  Foundations  of  Education.  6(2), 128-152.
Hackmann,  D.G.,  &  McCarthy,  M.M.  (2011).  At  a  Crossroads:  The Educational  Leadership  Professoriate  in  the  21st  Century,  UCEA  Leadership Series:  ERIC.
Gladys  Styles,  J.,  &  Camp  Yeaky,  C.  (1986).  Research  and  Thought  in Educational  Administration  Theory,  Translated  by  Seyed  Mohammad  Mirkamali (Ph.D.).  (1986).  Yastroon  Publications.
Khodabandehlou,  R.,  Mehran,  G.,  Mohseni,  H.S.,  &  Rajabi,  F.  (2019).  An Analytical  Study  of  Professional  Development  in  Preschool  Education:  An overview  of  the  research,  New  Thoughts  on  Education  Faculty  of  Education  and Psychology,  Alzahra  university,  15(1).
Litterell,  J.,  &  Foster,  W.  (1998).  The  Myth  of  Knowledge  Base  in Administration.  In  the  Knowledge  Base  in  Educational  Administration. NewYork:  NewYork  Press.
McLellan,  J.,  Campbell,  R.,  Fleming,  T.,  Newell,  L.,  &  Bennion,  J.  (1988).  A History  of  thought  and  practice  in  educational  administration,  JSTOR.
Mohseni,  H.S.,  &  Khodabadelou,  R.  (2017).  A  Bibliometric  Analysis  of  the Journal  Studies  in  Higher  Education  (1990  –  2016),  ASIA  International Conference.
Mansourkia,  M.  (1992).  Analysis  of  Systems  and  Methods  in  Management  of Administrative,  Industrial  and  Commercial  Affairs.  Tehran:  Morvarid Publications.
Norberg,  K.,  &  Gross,  S.J.  (2019).  Turbulent  Ports  in  a  Storm:  The  Impact  of Newly  Arrived  Students  Upon  Schools  in  Sweden,  Values  and  Ethics  in Educational  Administration,  14(1).
Oplatka,  I.  (2010).  The  Legacy  of  Educational  Administration;  A  Historical Analysis  of  an  Academic  Field;  as  a  Scientific  Field,  translated  by  Naser Shirbagi.  (2019).  Tehran,  Asar  Moaser  Publication.
Oplatka,  I.  (2009).  The  field  of  Educational  Administration:  A  Historical overview  of  scholarly  attempts.  Journal  of  Educational  Administration,  47(1),  835.
Ozdemir,  M.  (2011).  Educational  Administration:  A  Science  at  the Intersection  of  Public  Administration  and  Business  Administration,  Amme Idaresi,  44(2),  29-42.
Rastehmoghadam,  A.  (2018).  “Visualization  of  Global  Scientific  Map  of Educational  Administration,    Based  on  Web  of  Science  and  its  Explanation  from Experts'  (well-Groundeds)  View”,  Ph.D  Dissertation,  Allameh  Tabataba'i University,  Faculty  of  Psychology  and  Education.
Ribbins,  P.  (2006).  History  and  the  study  of  Administration  and  Leadership in  Education:  Introduction  to  a  special  Issue.  Journal  of  Educational Administration  and  History,  38(2),  113-124.
Saeedi  Rezvani,  M.,  &  Bahremand  A.  (2009).  Reflection  on  Educational Administration  Educability:  Criticisms  and  Perspectives,  Educational  Studies and  Psychology,  University  of  Ferdowsi  Mashhad,  Faculty  of  Educational Sciences  and  Psychology.
Schwab,  J.  (1979).  Remarks  made  at  a  group  session  of  American Educational  Research  Association,  San  Francisco.
Values  and  Ethics  in  Educational  Administration,  Consortium  for  The  Study of  Leadership  and  Ethics  in  Education  UCEA,  14)1(.