Representation of School Principals Experiences of Success and Failure

Document Type : Qualitative Research Paper

Authors

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

2 استادیار مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

3 استادیار روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

Abstract

School principals have a significant impact on school outcomes. The impact of top managers on increasing organizational productivity is well evident in education organizations today. Given the importance of this issue, the purpose of this study was to access the experiences of success and failure among school principals. The participants were selected using purposeful sampling method. Therefore, to understand what school principals do, this research was conducted with an interpretive approach and the qualitative method of grounded theory. Research scope was Esfahan city and the participants were 20 principals who were considered successful by students, parents and officials of the Department of Education. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Data analysis was performed in the form of three-step coding. The analysis of the interviews showed that the successful experiences of principals can be outlined as the following topics: human issues, financial and civil issues, evaluation and administrative affairs. Also, the results showed that successful principals manage experiences through 4 mechanisms including human, specialized, semantic and developmental mechanisms. The results of the research include useful practical points for educators; one of them is that decisions such as providing graduate education for working teachers in the management sector and paying attention to specialization, improving the economic situation and evaluation methods can provide a more favorable working environment for principals and their success.  
School is one of the most important social, educational and training institutions and the main pillar of education in order to properly train students in various scientific and social dimensions and it is run according to the approved objectives of the courses as well as the rules and instructions of education (Karami & Nasiri, 2020). School principals in the role of curriculum leaders need to have a clear understanding of the core of any school-implemented curriculum. School principals do not need to specialize in all subject curricula, but they must ensure that students have learned effectively the knowledge, perception, and skills embedded in the curriculum as they are taught (Sheikh Momahmmadi and Khalkhali, 2018). Good management predicts the success of the organization. Research findings comparing management approaches with established expectations indicate that organizations performances can be explained by management techniques 18%, research and development 17%, employee skills 11%, and information technology 8% (Bloom & Van Reenen & Brynjolfsson 2017).
The exploratory nature of the research emphasized the perceptions of the participants (successful managers) and the minor experiences that led to their success; therefore, according to Mason, it was assumed that the world of these managers is affected by a set of multiple realities that are themselves affected by the political, social, economic conditions and other beliefs. The main part of this model is the acceptance of the mentality and admitting the researcher's active participation in the construction and interpretation of data in a serious process with the participants and the data. In other words, the researcher was not an objective and independent observer but part of the reality that was made in the research process. Grounded theory of social structuralism motivates the researcher to search for sources and collect information, so the researcher made a purposeful choice of homogeneous type for sampling and then made a final choice based on the following inclusion criteria: while studying, the subject should be still in a managerial position; be willing to cooperate and enter the interview; allow the recording and then transcribing the interviews; have more than 5 years of management experience. In this study, in order to collect data, a centralized semi-structured interview was used and the duration of each interview was between 60 to 120 minutes. The research which focuses on a specific area of practice, requires a smaller sample size. Since the minor experience of successful managers was considered in this study, the small sample size was appropriate. Until the data was saturated, the selection of participants continued for up to 20 interviews. Research. Theoretical sampling was used when the axial code or the resulting class of a set of axial codes were ambiguous and the purpose of theoretical sampling was to purify the emerging classes, to identify their limitations and to improve the meaning and clarify the relationship between classes; the gap between classes was also checked. This helped answer the "why" questions and went beyond answering the "what" questions. For theoretical sampling, two managers were contacted again and a second interview was requested. After the face-to-face meeting, the results extracted from the data were presented to them. Here, the results were clarified and the purpose was not to validate or confirm the analysis, but the researcher sought to expand and strengthen the analysis with the help of the subject views on the field. The second interview lasted 10- 15 minutes. In the data analysis method, the initial coding was as follows: The interviews were studied and coded line by line. During that stage, an attempt was made to produce codes that were shorter, closer to the data and more abstract than the data itself. The second stage was axial coding in which the initial codes in each interview were categorized and then those with high analytical value were identified. By analyzing each interview and advancing in the comparative analysis of some axial codes, a more accurate reflection of what was hidden in the data was provided. While combining multiple layers of meaning and action, the axial codes that had high value in conceptualization received the title of classes.
After analyzing the data and completing the conceptual classes, the researcher conducted a second review of the texts, which enabled him/her to develop his/her theory based on the available results and theories. In qualitative studies, the researcher has to meet a value criterion that shows evidence of accuracy in data collection and analysis. In this regard, according to the data in order to achieve validity, which is one of the value criteria, study's data and interpretations should be grounded in the study events, not the researcher's personal biases. For this purpose, after the final interpretation of the data, the final result of the data analysis was reviewed and approved by the participating managers. Also, a psychologist outside the field of educational management who specialized in the field of qualitative research monitored the entire process of collecting to analyze and write the interpretations and confirmed the accuracy of the research and analysis process. Another criterion that was investigated in terms of value was the potential to transfer the extracted concepts in such a way that external judgment was possible. This work was reviewed and confirmed by drawing final diagrams and approval of three educational management specialists in the university. Finally, the theoretical model became an educational model and its effectiveness was evaluated in an educational study. The results confirmed the effectiveness of this model in reducing depression in the managers selected for this study; thus, according to the mentioned methods, triangulation was performed generally and the value of the research was confirmed.

Keywords


Agasisti, T., Bowers, AJ., & Soncin, M. (2018). School principals’ leadership types and student achievement in the Italian context: Empirical results from a three-step latent class analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 10(17):1–27.
Alagheband, A. (2017). Theoretical Foundations and Principles of Educational Administration. Ed(6). Ravan.
Alvani, S. M., Hamidi, N., & Mohammadloo, A. (2011). A survey on the relationship between the personal characteistics of successful schools administers and their performance. Abhar department of education Journal Quanti Tative Researches in Manajement, 2(2):179-160. [in persian].
Anca, V.Ă.C & Dumitru, D.D. (2012). LEADERSHIP-A KEY FACTOR TO A SUCCESFUL ORGANIZATION-part I. Studies in Business & Economics7(3):67-78.
Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1):6-14.
Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., Brynjolfsson E. (2017). Good Management Predicts a Firm’s Success Better Than IT, R&D, or Even Employee Skills. Harvard Business Review. April 19. https://hbr.org/. Retrieved Nov 2017.
Baniasad, S., HosseinGholiZadeh, R., & AminKhandaghi, M. (2018). From Effectiveness to Excellence: Gap between Theory, Research and Practice in the School Management Excellence Program. Foundation of Education. 7(2):124-148.
Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and managing people in education. Sage.
Beare, H., Caldwell, B. J., & Millikan, R. H. (2018). Creating an excellent school: Some new management techniques. Routledge.
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
Clarke, A. E. (2007). Feminisms, grounded theory, and situational analysis. na.
Charms, K. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Second Edition (Second, pp. 509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. sage.
Day, C. (2011). Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Daft, R. L. (2014). The leadership experience. Cengage Learning.
Everard, K. B., Morris, G., & Wilson, I. (2004). Effective school management. Sage.
Guedes, M. J., & da Conceição Gonçalves, V. (2019). Top managers' characteristics as causal explanations for self-reported performance. Journal of Business Research101:pp 869-874.
Karami R, Nasiri F. (2020). A Study of Relationship between School-Based Management Style with Career Success and Job Compatibility. Journal of School Administration, 8(1):283-301. [in persian].
Karlsson, T., Wijk, K., & Bänziger, T. (2011). A description of work environment management in succesful companies. In NES2011: 43rd Annual Conference of the Nordic Ergonomics Society, Oulu, Finland, 18-21 september 2011 pp. 460-465. Nordic Ergonomics Society.
Khuzwayo, T. (2019). An exploratory study of the leadership experiences of senior African female executives in the private sector (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
Lemos, R., Van Reenen, J. (2014). Why school management matters even more than we thought. https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/may. Retrieved Nov 2017.
Lincon, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Califórnia: SAGE Publication.
Mason, M., Gargano, L., Kumar, A., & Northridge, ME. (2019). Implementing a Patient-Centered and Cost-Effective School-Based Oral Health Program. J Sch Health. 89(12):1024–1027.
MehrParsa, S (2019). The relationship between ethical leadership and the performance of school principals in Tehran. Journal leadership and educational management. 13(4):261-247. [in persian].
Masumi, KH. (2019). Performance management in agile organizations. Journal of Tadbir a Monthly Macazing on ManaGement, 30(315):15-11 [in persian].
Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (2013). A Manager's Guide to Self-development. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Prusak, L., & Davenport, T. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know.
SheikhMohammadi, Z., & Khalkhali, A. (2018). Principals' Lived Experience of Curriculum Leadership in Secondary Schools. Journal of School Administration, 6(1):22-42. [in persian].
Sabzianpoor, Z., & Eslampanah, M. (2019). Identifying Indicators of Education leadership in teaching– learning process. Journal of Educational Administration Research Quartery, Articls in press, [in persian].
Yukongdi, V. (2016). Characteristics of Successful Managers: A Study of Thai Employees' Perception. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(3):322-31.