Designing a Desirable Authentic Leadership Model for Principals

Document Type : Mixed Method Research Paper

Authors

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران

2 استادیار مدعو گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران

3 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد تربت حیدریه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تربت حیدریه، ایران

https://org/10.34785/J010.2021.768

Abstract

Authentic leader is viewed as one that is deeply conscientious of the way he thinks and behaves and he is perceived by the others as having this conscience not only of self, but also of the moral values and the personal characteristics of the others. The authentic leader, on one hand, acts in accordance with its deep values and convictions to construct the credibility and to gain the respect and the confidence of its subordinates. On the other hand, he encourages diverse points of view and he creates a relation of collaboration among its subordinates. The authentic leadership, which is a derivation and an improvement of the transformational leadership, has acquired great relevance in the last years due to the unexpected changes that the organizations and the contemporary societies had suffered.
A more complete explanation of the way in which authentic leaders function in educational institutions and other working environments is provided by focusing on research and by describing the factors of authentic leadership.
Therefore, this study paid special attention to designing the optimal model of genuine leadership with regard to the activities of educational managers, organizational structure of education, output and results in the education organization and tries to make a significant difference based on specific and necessary activities in education. This organization should design.
This study was conducted in Iranian education; Although numerous studies have been presented in the field of authentic leadership and other leadership styles, more or less there is a need for a model based on authentic leadership style and consistent with the functional nature of educational managers.
The important issue of this research is how to provide a desirable model of authentic leadership for managers.  One of the important aspects that has been paid special attention in this research is the concept of leadership style in schools. Management in any organization acts as its core and thinking brain, and this element is of particular importance in educational units. In addition to the commonalities with other formal organizations, education has its own characteristics that require special conditions and capabilities to manage and administer. In principle, the development of any society depends on the activities carried out in education, and the influence of the school principal as an educational leader cannot be ignored.
Educational organizations, especially schools, as organizations that work to educate the current generation of the country, should benefit from the latest technologies and new theories of organization and management to quickly meet the needs of their customers, students, parents and society. The role of educational leaders in transferring updated experiences and needs in this field to the educational area, as well as providing constructive and research proposals and projects, is prominent and vital. Genuine leadership in education is defined as ethical leadership practices and moral literacy in behaviors associated with school leaders.
Finally, it can be said that although numerous studies have been presented in the field of authentic leadership and other leadership styles, but more or less there is a need for a model based on authentic leadership style and consistent with the functional nature of educational managers. A distinct issue in this study to design a genuine leadership model is special attention to leadership in the educational organization.
Therefore, this study devoted special attention to designing the optimal model of authentic leadership with regard to the activities of educational managers, educational organizational structure, output and results in the educational organization and tries to design a model suitable for this organization.
The present study aimed to design an appropriate model of authentic leadership. An exploratory sequential mixed method (qualitative-quantitative) was used. Qualitative part of the study included qualitative content analysis; quantitative part was conducted by using a survey method. To do so, qualitative part of the study identified components of authentic leadership among principals; quantitative part was performed to statistically examine qualitative data. Participants of the study included 13 professors majoring in educational administration chosen by using a purposive sampling technique.
Having used a cluster sampling, the researcher selected 132 school managers from among total population. A semi-structured interview was used to collect the qualitative data. Individual interviews consisted of four open-ended questions.
Concerning qualitative content analysis, three phases of open, axial, and selective coding were used.  To validate the qualitative data, criterion of acceptability was used. Also, to make sure of the validity of the qualitative data, participants’ feedbacks were taken into consideration. To verify the reliability of qualitative data a holistic method was employed. 
 
The questionnaire involves 45 items and 11 components that has been adjusted according to five-point Likert scale . At qualitative phase, in order to analyze interview data   open coding, axial coding and selective coding were employed and at the quantitative phase, confirmatory factor analysis test by means of smart pls3 was chosen.
 
Having developed the questionnaire, the researcher sent a copy to a group of experts, professors, and principals. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed based on the feedbacks and comments.
It was, therefore, found that the questionnaire items were capable of explaining and measuring what needed to be measured. To check reliability of the questionnaire, it was administered to 30 managers of Khorasan Razavi schools in order to compute Cronback’s Alpha. Finally data showed a coefficient of .81 thus confirming the reliability.
To analyze the qualitative data three phases of open, axial and selective coding were used.  Primary phase of qualitative data included 45 open codes extracted from the interview administered to the experts. The findings of qualitative phase consisting of 11 components (inspiring, flexibility, extroversion, commitment, deep attraction, cooperative spirit, transparency in relationship, sympathy, balanced information process, moral landscape and common landscape) were recognized.
In the third phase of the data analysis, the 11 elicited concepts were categorized as the main category or theme entitled authentic leadership.
To test the conceptual model of the study in quantitative part, modeling algorithm in Smart PLS was used and required analyses were conducted in three sections, e.g. measurement model fit, structural model fit, general fit (measurement and structure).  Results of factor analysis indicated a fitness of the desirable model of authentic model. It can be concluded that the 11 identified components could strengthen and develop authentic leadership among principals.

Keywords


Abdullahi, N. (2016). Discovering the original leadership model of higher education managers: A qualitative study. Master Thesis, Educational Management, Shiraz University. [in Persian].
Al Sahi A. M. S., Ahmad, K. Z., & Hossan, C. (2016). Authentic leadership, work engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors in Petroleum Company. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6): 811-830.
Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly. 30. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001.
Amanda, S., Hinojosa, K., Davis, M., Brandon, R., William L., & Gardner, W. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader –follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, (2014). 254-287.
Asghari, M., Yazdkhasty, A., & Madani, S. A. (2019). The study of the relationship between leadership styles school principals with organizational skills of time management. Journal of School Administration, 6(2): 1-18. [in persian].
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801–823.
Badri, M., & Nodehi, H. (2015). Predicting innovation capabilities based on genuine leadership style in education. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 6(3): 125-150. [in Persian].
Braun, S., Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2018). Connectionism in action: Exploring the links between leader prototypes, leader gender, and perceptions of authentic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 129-144.
Chao Miao, R. H., & Humphrey, S. Q. (2018). Emotional intelligence and authentic leadership: a meta-analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5): 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2018-0066.
Chong, S., Djurdjevic, E., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Implicit measures for leadership research. In B. Schyns, R. J. Hall, & P. P. Neves (Eds.). Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research (pp. 13–47). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Diddams, M., & Chang, G. C. (2012). only human: Exploring the nature of weakness in authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,23, 593-603.
Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2017). The Impact of Transformational and Authentic Leadership on Innovation in Higher Education: The Contingent Role of Knowledge Sharing, Telematics and Informatics.
Fallatah, F., & Laschinger, H. K. (2016). The influence of authentic leadership and supportive professional practice environments on new graduate nurses job satisfaction. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(2): 125–136. doi:10.1177/1744987115624135.
Faqirnejad, F., & Fattahi, M. (2019). Investigating the effect of genuine leadership on organizational virtue mediated by psychological capital. Bimonthly. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences, 12(1): 116-122. [in Persian].
Feng, F. (2016). School principal's Authentic leadership and teachers psychological capital: teachers perspectives. International education studies, 9(10).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Gardner, W. L., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2004). Unleashing individual potential: Performance gains through positive organizational behavior and authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3): 270–279
Ghanbari, S., & Pakizeh, E. (2016). The role of principled leadership of principals in the level of job attachment of primary school teachers in Hamadan. Educational Management Innovations, 11(2): 11-24. [in Persian].
Karimi, R., Bashlideh, K., & Hashemi, I. (2019). The effect of genuine leadership on burnout through the mediation of work life and job coping self-efficacy. Journal of Psychology, 23(2): 166-180. [in Persian].
Kiersch, C. E. (2012). A multi-level examination of authentic leadership and organizational justice in uncertain times. Doctoral dissertation, Colora- do State University.
Kiersch, C., & Peters, J. (2017). Leadership from the inside out: student teadeship development within authentic leadeshipand servent leadership framework. Journal of leadership education,16(1): 148- 168.
Miao, C., Humphrey, R., & Qian, S. (2018). Emotional intelligence and authentic leadership: a meta-analysis.  Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5): 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2018-0066.
Mir Mohammadi, M., & Rahimian, M. (2014). A Study of Genuine Leadership in Employee Individual Creativity with Considering the Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Management Research in Iran, 18(3): 181-203. [in Persian].
Momeni, N. (2011). Designing and explaining the developed model of genuine leadership based on the perspective of Allameh Tabatabai. PhD Thesis in Behavioral Management, Tarbiat Modares University. [in Persian].
Moradi Moghadam, M., Jafari, S., & Nabavi, S. M. (2018). Structural relationships between original leadership style and job motivation and positive organizational behavior of teachers. Educational Management Innovations, 13(2): 61-80. [in Persian].
Pirannejad, A. (2013). Authentic leadership, an essential style in university management. Journal of Management at Islamic University, 2(2): 330-347. [in Persian].
Rahimian, H., & Badri, M. (2015). The relationship between original leadership style and human resource agility in education. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management Research, 3(9): 1-24. [in Persian].
Rastegar, A., Talebi, S., Nadi, Z., & Seif, M. H. (2016). The relationship between authentic leadership and teachers' organizational citizenship behavior: with the mediating role of academic optimism. Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 10 (1): 49-62. [in Persian].
Roche, M. (2010). learning authentic leadership in new zealand:Alearner- centred Methology And Eveluation. Journal of Business Education. 3(3). 71-77.
Safi, A. (2004). Change and innovation in Iranian education and future prospects. Educational Innovation Quarterly, 3(2): 110-130. [in Persian].
Sagnak, M., & kuruoz, M. (2017). Authentic leadership and altruism: the mediating role of meaningfulness. University journal of education research, 5(3): 447-452.
Sepahvand, R., Arefnejad, M., & Shariatnejad, A. (2018). Analysis of the identity characteristics of the original leadership in order to improve human resources using the approach of interpretive ranking process (IRP). Public Management Research, 11(39): 199-227. [in Persian].
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.