Investigating the Situation of Educational Equity in the Public Schools in Tehran

Document Type : Mixed Method Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.

3 Master's student in educational management, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The issue of equity has always been the main discourse and the most vital factor of social institutions. Given education and schools are part of social institutions, the issue of equity is a key point in these environments. Thus, the present study investigated the situation of educational equity in public schools in Tehran. 
Our research was practical in terms of purpose, and it was exploratory mixed research (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of method. In the first step, researchers tended to extract the dimensions of educational equity. So, 18 experienced teachers (with experience higher than 20 years) as experts (individuals who were more aware of the issue of study) were interviewed by non-probabilistic and purposeful sampling method and also, considering theoretical saturation in the data. For the analyzing interviews, we used the thematic analysis method. For checking the validity of the findings of the qualitative section we used two methods member checking and peer checking. As well, the reliability of the findings of the qualitative section was calculated by the retest method and according to Holst's formula, the reliability coefficientwas0.9. In the second step (quantitative section), after performing the qualitative step, researchers tried to design a quantitative tool (questionnaire) based on the conceptual model extracting from the qualitative step and then distribute it among high school students in Tehran (tenth, eleventh and twelfth grades). Therefore, the most appropriate method in the quantitative step was the descriptive survey research method; Because the researchers tended to examine the views and opinions of high school students about each of the dimensions of educational equity. Considering the large size of the research population in the quantitative section (320,000 students), Tehran city was categorized into five clusters (North, South, East, West, and Center). The researchers selected the students from different clusters using Krejcie and Morgan table. A total of 400 students was selected from five clusters. For evaluating the validity of the model obtained from the qualitative section, we used the structure validity by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in AMOS software version 24. Also, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure reliability, which (0.91) was obtained.Furthermore, to analyses the research questions we used, One-sample t-test, and the dependent t-test in SPSS software version 22.
The findings our study showed that, from the teachers' point of view, despite the fact that the condition of physical facilities was better than educational facilities and educational aids in public schools in Tehran, but this did not mean the favorable condition of public schools in terms of physical facilities.  Also, from the students' point of view, the current situation of physical facilities and educational aids in public schools in Tehran has been lower than average. So, there was no difference in terms of physical facilities and educational aids between the northern, southern, eastern, western, and central regions of Tehran. Furthermore, the situation of all regions in terms of the two components mentioned is lower than expected. In other words, public schools have not a favorable situation from the different dimensions of learning space management, including; having light and lighting sources, heating, and cooling appliances, yard, bathroom, number of tables and chairs, fit of classroom space, and the number of students. In fact, it can be said as much as teacher education is important, it is expected that educating specialists in the field of educational space management also is considered. Although experts of educational equity and educational administration have mentioned the close relationship between the administration and educational equity, the results of the present study are convincing evidence of the inability of management to implement educational equity. The factors such as; centralized management and lack of logistic thinking in the educational administrators are the most important reasons for the lack of educational equity in the education system. Despite the fact that it was expected from the perspective of the study participants, the favorable situation is above average, But the findings showed that there is a big gap between the current and the favorable situation. The difference between teachers 'and students' views on the unfavorable situation of physical and educational facilities can be due to the nature of their role and position in the education system, the type of view, and the priority of each component from the perspective of the participants and their demographic characteristics. Because physical facilities such as benches and chairs are most important for students, and perhaps from their point of view, these facilities can help to learn better and feel comfortable in the classroom. While teachers, given their educational role in the classroom, have more attention to educational facilities.
Considering the approaches of educational equity mentioned in the theoretical foundations and the results obtained from the present study, it is important that schools and educational institutions try to manage the educational facilities, educational aids, and physical also, allocation of costs be based on individual talents and characteristics. In other words, the efforts of educational administrators must be made in the direction of moving towards a realistic approach to educational equity. If this situation happens, we can expect the implementation of educational equity in a favorable way in society. Finally, based on the research findings, some suggestions are presented as follows;

Considering the differences between the regions of Tehran in terms of welfare facilities in the field of education, it is recommended that with instill of logistics thinking in the educational administrators, schools in deprived areas of Tehran be paid more attention to the budget, distribution of human, material and physical resources.
Run of school-based management policy should be implemented as one of the ways to remove educational inequity. Because each school planning and managing its resources, according to the needs themselves. 
Educating specialists of educational space management in the education system is necessary to help the public schools for using standard and quality facilities and equipment. Therefore, establishing centers for educating specialists and designers of learning spaces is recommended.
It is important that public school administrators try to hold synergistic meetings with charities and other organizations to equip public schools.

Keywords


Alaghehband, A. (2019). Bublic administration, 30th Edition, Tehran: Ravan publication. [In Persian].
Aghababaeian, P., Hatami, H., & Aghababaeian, P. (2015). Reflections on the role of centralism and decentralization in the structure of education and study of its implications in the Iranian curriculum system, International Conference on Management Economics and Social Sciences, 14 – 15 April. [In Persian].
Ansari, M., & Rajabi, M. (2016). An Analysis of the Components of Educational Justice by John Rawls, The 7th National Conference of the Iranian Philosophy of Education Association, May (30 & 31), 724 – 734. [In Persian].
Alaedini, P. (2015). Strategies to Reduce Educational Poverty; Seventy-two Narratives on the Development of Children's Educational Justice, Tehran: Termeh Publishing. [In Persian].
Bayat, Gh., & Ghasemi, M. (2020). Conceptualization of Justice in Iranian Educational System: A Case Study of Elementary and Secondary Schools' Text Books, Majlis & Rahbord, 26 (100), 7-46. [In Persian].
BaBadi Akasheh, Z., Sharif, S. M., & Jamshidian, A. (2010). Providing and Extending Equal Opportunity and Educational Justice in Education in Isfahan, Social Welfare, 10(37): 287-305. [In Persian].
Bagheri, Kh., & Najafi, N. (2008). Justice in Education on Islamic View: Emphasizing on Privatization of Schools, Psychology and Educational Sciences, 38(1): 21 – 43. [In Persian].
Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2005). leading and managing People in Education, Translated by Mohammad Reza Ahanchian and Mansoureh Atighi, 2015, Tehran: Roshd publication. [In Persian].
Evans, w., Junyoo, M., & sipple, J. (2010). School bulding quality effects are exacerbated by high levels of student mobility. Journal of frviron mental psychology, 239 - 244.
Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64, 119 – 157.
Guo – Brennan, L., & Guo – Brennan, M. (2020). Global Citizenship Educaition and Justic for Immigrant Students: Implications for Administration, Leadership, and Teaching in Schools, Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education, 1 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_40.
Ghelich, V. (2011). The Criteria for Distributional Justice: A Comparative Study of John Rawls and Shahid Motahari Viewpoints, Islamic Economics Studies, 3(1): 145 – 163. [In Persian].
Golparvar, M., & Nadi, M. A. (2009). Belief to the Just and Unjust World, Behavioral Justice, Justice in Evaluation and Distress at School, Research in Psychological health, 2(2): 52-61. [In Persian].
Golparvar, M., Javadian, Z., & Esmailian Ardestani, Z. (2012). Educational justice and civic-academic behaviors: the mediating role of academic ethics, New Thoughts on Education, 8(3): 85-106. [In Persian].
Hosseinivaez, M., Samari, E., & Fazlollahighamshi, S. (2017). Comparative study of educational facilities, spaces and equipment of primary schools in Qom with Iranian standard indicators, National Conference on New Research in Iran and the World in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Social Studies, 16 Nov, Conference Center of Shiraz Univwrsity International Division, 2. [In Persian].
Hosseininasab, S. D., Adib, Y., & Omrani, L. (2013). Evaluation of physical space and educational equipment for secondary schools in Tabriz, according to the standards and indicators of national development programs in academic year 2010-2011, Instruction and Evaluation, 6(21): 13-25. [In Persian].
Kinloch, V., & Dixon, K. (2018). Professional Development as Publicly Engaged Scholarship in Urban Schools: Implications for Educational Justice, Eduity, and Humanization, English Education, 50(2): 147 – 171.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607 - 610.
Kaveh, S. (2015). The Need to Improve the Quantity and Quality of Education in Primary School; Seventy-two Narratives on the Development of Children's Educational Justice, Tehran: Termeh Publishing. [In Persian].
Kyani, F., & Boyeri, M. (2016). Investigating the central role of management in government and justice, International Conference on Behavioral Sciences and Social Studies. [In Persian].
Keramati, M., Pourkarimi, J., & Zali, F. (2017).Comparison of the educational space of public and non-public schools, the case study: Karaj high schools, Journal of School Administration (JSA), 5(1): 51-72. [In Persian].
Macleod, C. M. (2010). Develomment of women`s education in Kenya, International NGO journal, 5(3): 68-73.
Marzooghi, R., Heidari, M., & Heidari, E. (2013). The Impact of Educational Justice on Student's Academic Burnout in the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Strides in Development of Medical Education, 10(3): 210 – 216. [In Persian].
Marshall, C. (2004). Social Justice Challenges to Educational Administration: Introduction to a Special Issue. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1): 5-15.
Naderi, A. (2004). The Economics of Education. Tehran: Yastoroon Publication. [In Persian].
Pan, X., Chen, M.,  Hao, Z., &  Bi., W. (2018). The Effects of Organizational Justice on Positive Organizational Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Sample Survey and a Situational Experiment, Organizational Psychology Journal, 8, 1 - 16.
Pahang, N., Mahdioun, R., & Yarigholi, B. (2017). Investigating the Quality of Schools and Identifying Related Affecting Factors: A Mixed Method Research, Journal of School Administration (JSA), 5(1): 173 – 193. [In Persian].
Rawls, John. (2004). Justice as Fairness: A Eloquence, Translated by Erfan Sabeti, Tehran: Phoenix Publishing. [In Persian].
Sameri, M., Hassani, M., Sbbaszadeh, M., & Mousavi, M. N. (2015). Explanation of Educational Inequality and Presenting Educational Development Model Inorder to Monitor and Achieving Educational Equity Case Study: Educational Districts of West Azarbaijan Province, Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 5(14): 105 – 122. [In Persian].
Sheikh Rezaei, H. (2017). What is Educational Justice? Journal of Life School Growth, 13(7): 4 – 6. [In Persian].
Safar Heydari, H., & Hosseinnazhad, R. (2014). The Perspectives of Educational Justice (A study about the position of educational justice in the Document of Iran Education System Transformation), Foundations of Education, 4(1): 49-72. [In Persian].
Theoharis, G. (2007). Social Justice Educational Leaders and Resistance: Toward a Theory of Social Justice Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2): 221-258.
Turhan, M. (2010). Social justice leadership: implications for roles and responsibilities of school administrators, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1357 – 1361.
Yamani, N., Shaterjalali, M., & Eghbali, B. (2017). Educational justice from the perspective of postgraduate students in a medical school in Iran: A qualitative study, Res Dev Med Educ, 6(1): 23-28. [In Persian].