The Unspoken Side of Academic Textbooks on School Management

Document Type : Qualitative Research Paper

Author

Assistant professor at the department of Educational Management, faculty of Psychology and Pedagogy, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

https://jsa.uok.ac.ir/article_62200.html

Abstract

group is some educators concerned with the educability of educational management knowledge. They need to simplify the concepts Every year, numerous academic textbooks on school management are published in Iran, yet only a small number of them are well received by academics. A common research method to analyze the content of these popular textbooks is content analysis which identify only the overt messages of the textbooks. However, every textbooks have also a covert massages that may attract such a wide audiences too. Therefore, the unspoken side of the textbooks is as important as the spoken side. Thus, two most popular and frequently published textbooks in the field of school management, namely, ‘An Introduction to Educational Management’, which has been republished 45 times, and ‘Theoretical Foundations and Principles of Educational Management’, which has been republished 25 times, were selected and analyzed through symptomatic reading. The results showed that the narration of these two books is based on a rational paradigm which views schools as an integrated and coordinated entities but neglects the game of power that always accompanied by contradiction and tension. Because to preserve of rational rhetoric, the textbooks rely on logic-based principles and only some theories are discussed in the books that are silent about power dynamics. Alagheband’s narration (the author of the books) tends to leave everything, related to ‘power dynamics’, unspoken. This narration would attract two groups of audiences; the first group is schools actors and other practitioners of educational system that are tired of school contradictions and its unfair world. Therefore, rational paradigm which remain unspoken on the game of power acts like as a remedy to tiredness and perceived unfairness. The second of and detoxify educational management complexities and inconveniences accordingly.

Keywords

References

Abazari, Y., & Khorshidnam, A. (2014). On Ekhrajiha. Cultural Studies and Communication, Vol 10, No 34, 11-32, [in Persian].
Alagheband, A. (2009). An introduction to educational management (fifth edition). Tehran: Ravan Publication.
Alagheband, A. (2014). The theoretical foundations and principles of educational management, (sixth edition).  Tehran: Ravan Publication.
Bates, Ch. (2005). Leadership and the Rationalization of Society. In Smyth, J. (Eds). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. (88-106). New York & London: Routledgeflamer.
Bates, Ch. (2005). Leadership and the Rationalization of Society. In Smyth, J. (Eds). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. (88-106). New York & London: Routledgeflamer.
Blackmore, J. (2005). Educational Leadership: A Feminist Critique and Reconstruction. . In Smyth, J. (Eds). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. (63-88). New York & London: Routledgeflamer. 
Bush, T. (2010). Theories of educational management and leadership (third edition). London, New Delhi: Sage publication.
Creswell, J, W., & Miller, D, L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry, Theory In to Practice, 39:3, 124-130.
Greenfield, Th., & Ribbins, P. (2005). Greenfield on educational administration: Toward a human science. London and New York: Routledge. 
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018).The dark side of leadership and management, School Leadership & Management, 38:5, 475-477.
Hatch, M, J. (2013). Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. (Third edition). London: Oxford university press.
Larson, C, L. (2011). Responsibility and accountability in educational leadership: keeping democracy and social justice central reform. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly. Volume 4, Number 4.
Leithwood, K., & J. Sun. (2012).The Nature and Effects of Transformational School leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Unpublished Research. Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (3): 387–423.
Lumby, J., & Coleman, M. (2007). Leadership and diversity: challenging theory and practice in education. London, New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Mcmilln, Ch. (2008). Symptomatic readings: Žižekian theory as a discursive strategy. International Journal of Zizek studies. IJŽS, Vol 2, 1. 1-22.
Pfeffer, J. (2010). Power: Why some people have it and others don’t. Harper business.
Pugh, D., & Hickson, D. (2007). Great writers on organization. (The third omnibus edition). British library: Ashgate.
Samier, E. A., & Milley, P. (2018). International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education. London: Routledge.
Simon, H. (1997). Administrative behavior: a study of decision- making processes in administrative organizations. London and New York: the free press.
Sogman, M. (2021). The secret life of the brain. Translated by Mandana Farhadian, Tehran, Asim and No publication, [in Persian].
Story, J. (2004). Popular stories. Translated by Hussian Payande, Arghanoon, No 25, 1-44, [in Persian].
Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: theory, research and management. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Watkins, P. (2005). Leadership, Power and Symbols in Educational Administration. . In Smyth, J. (Eds). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. (7-27). New York & London: Routledgeflamer.
Young, R. (2017). Rereading the symptomatic reading. In Nesbitt, N. (Eds). The concept in crisis: reading capital today. Durham and London: duke university press.
School Administration
Volume 10, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 32-43

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 March 2022
  • Accept Date: 01 May 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics